Norcross v. Gingery

Decision Date26 May 1967
Docket NumberNo. 36493,36493
Citation181 Neb. 783,150 N.W.2d 919
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
PartiesJohn G. NORCROSS, Appellant, v. Mildred S. GINGERY, Appellee.

Syllabus by the Court

1. Property may be shown to be partnership property by proof of an intent to devote it to partnership purposes.

2. Circumstantial evidence is not sufficient unless the circumstances proved are of such a nature and so related to each other that the conclusion reached is the only one that fairly and reasonably can be drawn therefrom.

3. Where several inferences may be drawn from the facts proved, which inferences are opposed to each other but equally consistent with the facts proved, the plaintiff may not sustain his position by a reliance alone on the inferences which would entitle him to recover.

Frederick J. Patz, Ralph H. Gillan, Lincoln, for appellant.

Dean R. Sackett, Beatrice, for appellee.

Heard before CARTER, SPENCER, BOSLAUGH, SMITH, McCOWN and NEWTON, JJ.

BOSLAUGH, Justice.

This is an action brought by John G. Norcross against Mildred S. Gingery to establish the plaintiff's interest in two parcels of real estate in Gage County, Nebraska; to partition the property; and for an accounting of the income from the property since the death of the defendant's husband. The trial court found that there was a failure of proof and dismissed the action. The plaintiff's motion for new trial was overruled and he has appealed.

The record shows that in 1939 the plaintiff owned a quarter section of land in Gage County, Nebraska, subject to a mortgage. The mortgage was in default and foreclosure proceedings had been commenced. The plaintiff wanted to refinance the property by obtaining a Federal Land Bank loan but was unable to do so because he did not live on the land.

At about this time the plaintiff was introduced to Fred W. Gingery, the defendant's late husband, by Charles Wells, a mutual acquaintance. Gingery then lived on a 30-acre tract near Filley, Nebraska. The plaintiff alleged that he had Gingery entered into a written partnership contract to operate a farming and livestock-feeding business in Gage County, Nebraska. The plaintiff's copy of the contract had been lost or destroyed, and he was unable to produce a copy of the contract.

Charles Wells testified that he had recommended Gingery to the plaintiff and was present in March of 1939 when they discussed a partnership arrangement. According to Wells, the plaintiff made a proposal to Gingery about the quarter section and the 30-acre tract near Filley and 'they was to go in fifty-fifth on the deal'; that Gingery 'was to make a farm loan * * * to pay off the mortgage' that the plaintiff had on the quarter section; and that 'they was to go in fifty-fifty at Filley and this place out here.' The evidence shows that Gingery obtained a $6,000 Federal Land Bank loan on the quarter section in March 1939 and that most of the net proceeds were used to pay off a mortgage and other indebtedness of the plaintiff.

The record further shows that on March 29, 1939, the plaintiff and hiw wife conveyed the quarter section to Fred W. Gingery and the defendant as joint tenants. The deed recites 'Six Thousand Dollars and exchange of properties' as the consideration. On the same date, Fred W. Gingery and the defendant conveyed the 30-acre tract to Lucile B. Norcross who was then the plaintiff's wife. This deed recited the consideration to be 'One Dollar and exchange of property.'

The deed to Mrs. Norcross was never recorded. On October 11, 1945, Fred W. Gingery and the defendant conveyed the 30-acre tract to Casey Gray and Ferne Gray. On March 25, 1946, Paul M. Logan and Grace E. Logan conveyed a 40-acre tract to Fred W. Gingery and the defendant as joint tenants. Gingery died in February 1962.

The...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Estate of Price, In re
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • June 6, 1986
    ...513 (1973) (negligence action); Haynes v. County of Custer, 186 Neb. 740, 186 N.W.2d 483 (1971) (negligence action); Norcross v. Gingery, 181 Neb. 783, 150 N.W.2d 919 (1967) (suit to establish interest in real estate, for partition, and for accounting); Popken v. Farmers Mutual Home Ins. Co......
  • Mittlieder v. Chicago and Northwestern Railway Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • June 23, 1969
    ...There must be something more which will lead a reasoning mind to one conclusion rather than another." And in Norcross v. Gingery, 181 Neb. 783, 150 N.W.2d 919, 921 (1967): "Where several inferences may be drawn from the facts proved, which inferences are opposed to each other but equally co......
  • Kohler v. Ford Motor Co., 37796
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • November 12, 1971
    ...so related to each other that the conclusion reached is the only one that fairly and reasonably can be drawn therefrom. Norcross v. Gingery, 181 Neb. 783, 150 N.W.2d 919. Where several inferences may be drawn from the facts proved, which inferences are opposed to each other but equally cons......
  • Swanson v. Commissioner, Docket No. 469-72 — 471-72.
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • March 11, 1974
    ...particular property belongs to a partnership is the intent of the partner to devote it to partnership business. Norcross v. Gingery, 181 Neb. 783, 150 N.W. 2d 919 (1967), and Bode v. Prettyman, 149 Neb. 179, 30 N.W. 2d 627 (1948). The present facts indicate that W. Clarke did not intend to ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT