Nordgren v. Western Colo. Power Co., 23107

Decision Date09 December 1968
Docket NumberNo. 23107,23107
Citation167 Colo. 421,448 P.2d 643
PartiesBryon NORDGREN, Plaintiff in Error, v. The WESTERN COLORADO POWER COMPANY, a Colorado corporation, Defendant in Error.
CourtColorado Supreme Court

Marvin Dansky, Denver, for plaintiff in error.

Loesch, Kreidler & Durham, Harrison Loesch, Montrose, for defendant in error.

MOORE, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to by name, was employed as an unskilled laborer by Monument Construction, Inc., which was engaged in erecting a steel building on a large floor space which had been entirely covered by a concrete slab. The building was being erected in Delta county for use as a storage place for fruit. The power lines of the Western Colorado Power Company passed directly over the building site before the construction work began. However, prior to the accident which resulted in injuries to Nordgren, the defendant company moved the line so that it did not remain above the concrete slab at any point. From one corner of the steel structure the line was 12 to 15 feet removed from the building, and from that point was extended diagonally away from the building site in a sharp angle which increased the distance from the building being erected. Nordgren was on the building site when the power line was moved, and he knew that the line was a high voltage wire. At its new location the line was strung in full conformity with recognized standards of safety. It was 35 feet 9 inches above the ground at the point where the contact was made which caused plaintiff's injuries.

On August 25, 1965, and prior thereto, a portable hoist tower was used by the construction crew. It was mounted on a tripod device having three wheels which were equipped with inflated tires. The workmen moved it about on the concrete slab as occasion required in the erection of the building. The tower portion of the device extended upward in sections. On August 25, 1965, it extended upward to a point above the power line. At about noon on that date Nordgren and other workmen were instructed by their foreman to move the hoist to a different position so that it would be available for use following the lunch period. In complying with this directive of the foreman, Nordgren and others pushed the hoist off the concrete slab and the top portion of the metal hoist came in contact with the high voltage wire above mentioned resulting in very severe injuries to the plaintiff. He brought action in the district court alleging that the injuries sustained were proximately caused by the negligence of Western Colorado Power Company.

A jury was selected to try the action. At the conclusion of the evidence offered on behalf of Nordgren, counsel for Western Colorado Power moved for a directed verdict on the grounds that no negligence of the company had been shown, and that even if negligence had been established, the evidence of contributory negligence as a matter of law prevented a recovery by Nordgren. The trial court sustained the motion and in so doing commented as follows:

'The Court has heard the arguments on the Defendant's motion for a directed verdict in this case and the Court has granted the motion inasmuch as there's no evidence in my opinion on which a Jury could find a breach of duty by the Defendant Power Company towards the Plaintiff in this case. There...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Foreman v. Atlantic Land Corp., 20718
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • 20 Junio 1978
    ...peril every possible circumstance under which some person might make contact with this wire." See also Nordgren v. Western Colorado Power Company, 167 Colo. 421, 448 P.2d 643 (1968); Donovan v. Union Electric Company, 454 S.W.2d 623 (Mo.App.1970); Gunn v. Edison Sault Electric Company, 24 M......
  • Smith v. Home Light and Power Co., 81CA0527
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • 13 Diciembre 1984
    ...claim, the trial court relied upon Currence v. Denver Tramway Corp., 132 Colo. 328, 287 P.2d 967 (1955) and Nordgren v. Western Colorado Power Co., 167 Colo. 421, 448 P.2d 643 (1968). Currence and Nordgren are inapplicable to section 402A cases. These cases concerned traditional negligence ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT