Norrid, Matter of, 15036

Decision Date30 September 1983
Docket NumberNo. 15036,15036
Citation100 N.M. 326,1983 NMSC 76,670 P.2d 580
PartiesIn the Matter of Buford NORRID, Attorney at Law.
CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court
OPINION

On November 10, 1982, Buford Norrid (Norrid) pled guilty in Federal Court to willful failure to file his federal income tax return for the tax year 1976 in violation of 26 U.S.C. Section 7203 (1976). Norrid was given a one year suspended sentence with three years supervised probation.

On February 14, 1983, this Court suspended Norrid pursuant to NMSA 1978, Supreme Court Rules Governing Discipline Rule 13, and referred the matter to the Disciplinary Board.

A Specification of Charges was filed against Norrid on February 16, 1983, alleging that Norrid had willfully failed to file his 1976, 1977 and 1978 federal income tax returns. In his Answer to the charges, Norrid admitted the allegations.

A hearing was held in Carlsbad on March 31, 1983, at which time the hearing committee appointed to hear the charges (Committee) listened to Norrid's explanation of his conduct and recommended that Norrid's suspension be six months in duration without automatic reinstatement.

On May 20, 1983, a panel of the Disciplinary Board (Panel) heard oral argument on the issue of the length of Norrid's suspension. On July 8, 1983, the Panel affirmed the recommendation of the Committee and suggested to this Court that an exception be made to NMSA 1978, Supreme Court Rules Governing Discipline Rule 4(a)(2) to permit Norrid to be automatically reinstated at the conclusion of the six months suspension.

This matter came before this Court on August 3, 1983, for oral argument. We adopt the Disciplinary Board's finding that Norrids's conduct adversely reflected upon his fitness to practice law in violation of NMSA 1978, Code of Professional Responsibility Rule 1-102(A)(6) (Repl.Pamp.1982). We are mindful that Norrid has now fully paid his back taxes and the penalties he incurred. However, it is the policy of this Court that attorneys should not be allowed to practice law while on probation under a criminal sentence.

We therefore disbar Norrid until he is no longer on probation. At the end of this period, Norrid may move for reinstatement only upon a showing that he has taken and passed the Multi-state Professional Responsibility Examination with a score set by this Court under the Rules for Admission to the New Mexico State Bar and that he has paid all outstanding costs.

Costs of these proceedings are assessed against Norrid in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Byrd v. The Mississippi Bar
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • July 25, 2002
    ...In re Wilson, 24 N.J. 277, 131 A.2d 750 (1957) (two years of nonfiling and unblemished record—one year suspension); Matter of Norrid, 100 N.M. 326, 670 P.2d 580 (1983) (one year of nonfiling with no indication of prior violations —disbarred until completion of three year suspension and atta......
  • In re Culpepper, 88-0674.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Michigan
    • July 15, 1991
    ...to practice law while he is on probation for a criminal sentence for a serious crime such as this. Id. Likewise, in Matter of Norrid, 100 N.M. 326, 670 P.2d 580 (1983), the New Mexico court disbarred an attorney who, like Petitioner Culpepper, was sentenced to probation for income tax evasi......
  • Board of Law Examiners of State v. Stevens
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • January 5, 1994
    ...v. Barnes, 286 Md. 474, 408 A.2d 719, 723 (1979); State v. Fitzgerald, 165 Neb. 212, 85 N.W.2d 323, 327 (1957); In re Norrid, 100 N.M. 326, 326, 670 P.2d 580, 580 (1983), or as otherwise warranting discipline. In re Rohan, 21 Cal.3d 195, 145 Cal.Rptr. 855, 857, 578 P.2d 102, 104 (1978); Peo......
  • In re Treinen
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • March 28, 2006
    ...101, 811 P.2d 1312 (1991); In re McCulloch, 103 N.M. 542, 710 P.2d 736 (1985); In re Griffin, 101 N.M. 1, 677 P.2d 614; In re Norrid, 100 N.M. 326, 670 P.2d 580 (1983). This policy was most recently reiterated in In re Key, 2005-NMSC-014, 137 N.M. 517, 113 P.3d 340, and In re Mikus, 2006-NM......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT