North Texas Nat. Bank v. Thompson
Decision Date | 12 October 1929 |
Docket Number | (No. 10439.)<SMALL><SUP>*</SUP></SMALL> |
Citation | 23 S.W.2d 494 |
Parties | NORTH TEXAS NAT. BANK v. THOMPSON et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Dallas County; Claude M. McCallum, Judge.
Action by the North Texas National Bank against D. G. Thompson and others. From a judgment for defendants Thompson and others, plaintiff appeals. Reversed and remanded.
Thomas, Storey & Grady, of Dallas, for appellant.
Saner, Saner & Jack, I. M. Williams, and Beall, Worsham, Rollins, Burford & Ryburn, all of Dallas, and J. L. Gammon, of Waxahachie, for appellees.
The North Texas National Bank, plaintiff below, appeals from an adverse judgment rendered upon an instructed verdict. As the decision of the case will turn largely upon the construction of written instruments, they will be set out at length.
On July 29, 1921, T. J. Cole, I. M. Williams, D. G. Thompson, R. K. Erwin, and Mrs. Ella H. Gibson, stockholders and directors of Texas Mortgage Company of Texas, a corporation, executed and delivered to Southwest National Bank of Dallas, Tex., the following written instrument:
After the execution of this instrument, Texas Mortgage Company became indebted to Southwest Bank in the sum of $4,000, evidenced by a note remaining unpaid on May 13, 1925, when Southwest Bank and plaintiff bank entered into the following written agreement, to wit:
In accordance with the provisions of the agreement between the banks, appellant permanently accepted and became the owner of the note for $4,000, held by Southwest Bank against the mortgage company, above referred to, and incidentally, of course, became assignee of the guaranty held as security therefor. The mortgage company, however, paid appellant this note on July 8, 1925, and from that date until February 1, 1926, no additional debt was created; but on the latter date, appellant, relying upon the validity and continuing existence of the guaranty, loaned the mortgage company $20,000, which remains unpaid.
This suit is bottomed on the idea that, appellant, under the facts and circumstances of the case, is both a successor and an assign of Southwest Bank, and that, as such, the guaranty ran in its favor; hence it was authorized to rely upon same in making said loan to the mortgage company.
At the conclusion of the evidence, the court, of its own motion, instructed the jury to return a verdict against appellant and in favor of appellees, and also directed a verdict in favor of plaintiff against defendant R. K. Erwin. Having instructed a verdict in favor of appellees, the reason that actuated the court in instructing a verdict against R. K. Erwin, a coguarantor, is not apparent, but this is an immaterial inquiry, as Erwin does not appeal. W. J. Rutledge, Jr., trustee in bankruptcy for Texas Mortgage Company, was also brought in as a defendant, but the suit was dismissed as to him. Judgment following the verdict, as directed by the court, was rendered for plaintiff against Erwin, and in favor of defendants, Williams, Thompson, and Mrs. Gibson, that plaintiff take nothing as to them, from which this appeal is prosecuted.
Appellees say that appellant's brief should not be considered because it does not contain an assignment of error. This objection is not well taken. The brief of appellant...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Harris Trust and Sav. Bank v. Stephans, 80-1937
...Harris. (See City Nat'l Bank and Trust Co. v. Bairstow (1943), 319 Ill.App. 632, 636, 50 N.E.2d 111; North Texas Nat'l Bank v. Thompson (Tex.Civ.App. 1929), 23 S.W.2d 494, aff'd (1931), 37 S.W.2d 735.) Defendants point out that the guaranty also states, "in consideration of advances made or......
-
Bartmann v. Maverick Tube Corp.
...341, 342-43 (Tex.App.1971); Interstate Trust & Banking Co. v. Sabatier, 189 La. 199, 179 S. 80, 82 (1937); North Texas Nat'l Bank v. Thompson, 23 S.W.2d 494, 498-99 (Tex.App.1929); see also Carlock v. National Co-Operative Refinery Assoc., 424 F.2d 148, 149-50 (10th Cir.1970) that such term......
-
Southwest Savings Association v. Dunagan
...& Trust Co. of McAllen v. United Paperboard Co., Tex.Civ.App., 146 S.W.2d 832; Jarecki Mfg. Co. v. Hinds, supra; North Texas Nat'l Bank v. Thompson, Tex.Civ.App., 23 S.W.2d 494, affirmed Tex.Com.App., 37 S.W.2d 735. Thus a guarantor's obligation is limited to his undertaking and is not to b......
-
Northcott v. Nieman
... ... First Nat. Bank of Redondo v. Spalding, 177 Cal ... 217, 170 P ... First State Bank, 102 ... Okl. 4, 225 P. 715; North Texas Bank v. Thompson (Tex ... Civ.App.) 23 S.W.2d 494; ... ...