Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. McGivern, s. 49021-49024
Decision Date | 24 June 1974 |
Docket Number | No. 3,Nos. 49021-49024,s. 49021-49024,3 |
Citation | 132 Ga.App. 297,208 S.E.2d 258 |
Parties | NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Pauline McGIVERN. Pauline McGIVERN v. NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Charles R. McGIVERN. CHARLES R. McGIVERN v. NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Moore & Morris, Charles E. Moore, Atlanta, for appellant.
Marvin P. Nodvin, Ira S. Zuckerman, Atlanta, for appellees.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
These appeals and cross appeals are from orders of the trial judge. (1) Orders partially sustaining defendant's motions to strike, and impliedly overruling in part, entered November 5, 1973; and, (2) orders overruling defendant's motions for summary judgment entered the same date. The orders were certified by the trial judge for immediate review pursuant to Ga.L.1965, p. 18; 1968, pp. 1072, 1073 (Code Ann. § 6-701(a)(2)).
The paragraphs of the complaints, pertinent to the motions to strike, are identical in each complaint, although differently numbered. For the purposes of this decision we will deal with the allegations of the complaint in the Pauline McGivern case, the rulings in reference to which will control both cases. The complaint in this portion contained in the following allegations, Par. 10A by amendment: Paragraph 10A attached a printed copy of a publication entitled 'Public Swimming Pools-Recommended Standards of the Georgia Department of Public Health.' Paragraph 13 alleged wilful, malicious and wanton negligence primarily based upon alleged violations of the DeKalb County ordinance, and sought punitive damages in the amount of $1,000,000, plus reasonable attorney fees of $350,000. Paragraph (c) of the prayers also prayed for recovery of this amount. This prayer, together with the allegations in paragraph 13 that the plaintiff is entitled to punitive damages in the amount of $1,000,000, plus reasonable attorney fees of $350,000, were stricken. The portions of the other paragraphs stricken pursuant to the motion to strike have been italicized.
The evidence adduced on the motion for summary judgment showed substantially the following facts: Appellant insurance company owns and operates the Beacon Hill Apartments in DeKalb County, Georgia, which complex includes a swimming pool. On July 3, 1973, Mrs. Pauline McGivern and her husband, Mr. Charles R. McGivern, the cross appellants, were seated in chairs in the vicinity of the pool talking to a Mr. Driver and other residents while the McGivern children and others played in the pool. Subsequently, an unidentified child approached the McGiverns and remarked that their son, Arthur, age 12, had been lying face down in the water for quite a while. Because Arthur was given to testing his endurance by holding his breath under water in that manner, Mr. McGivern and Mr. Driver walked to the end of the pool where Arthur was observed floating face down in the water. They watched Artie for 'an inordinant length' of time before Mr. McGivern jumped in the water and swam underneath his son to take a look. He came back up and yelled. With Mr. Driver's assistance, the boy was pulled from the pool. He was not breathing and had a bluish complexion. Mr. Driver and a Mr. Collins tried both artificial respiration and mouth-to-mouth resuscitation. Someone obtained a mechanical resuscitator, but no one knew how to use it. The police, who had been summoned, arrived some 10 to 12 minutes after the boy was taken from the pool and also tried unsuccessfully to restore breathing. The boy was taken to a hospital and pronounced dead. Held:
1. Appellant, Northwestern Mutual, complains that the trial court erred in finding that the swimming pool in the instant case is a semi-public pool and governed by the Code of DeKalb County, State of Georgia, Section 189, et seq., which requires certain standards be met if 'a public, semi-public or institutional swimming pool is operated.' From the factual recitation in the pleadings, both the public and institutional categories are excluded. Appellant urges that the prefix 'semi' in the ordinance has no meaning of sufficient certainty so as to advise citizens of what course of conduct they must follow in regard to the intendment of the Code, id., in relation to swimming pools. We agree only that some of the language in the ordinance is not plain; it does not have an exact or concrete meaning. The language, therefore, needs interpretation. Carroll v. Ragsdale, 192 Ga. 118, 120, 15 S.E.2d 210; Oxford v. Carter, 216 Ga. 821, 822, 120 S.E.2d 298. In determining the meaning of an ordinance, the court is bound by the rules of statutory construction. An ordinance intended to promote the public safety should receive a reasonable and practical interpretation to that end. Smeltzer v. Atlanta Coach Co., 44 Ga.App. 53, 56, 160 S.E. 665. In our present affluent society a swimming pool is as much a demanded part of a motel, hotel or modern apartment complex accommodations as is a television set, air conditioning, or adequate parking facilities....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Watts v. Jaffs
...538 (1987). It is a jury question whether such negligence was the proximate cause of the injury. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. McGivern, 132 Ga.App. 297, 301 (2), 208 S.E.2d 258 (1974). Enforcement of the ordinance is not limited to the imposition of fines or other sanctions by the gov......
-
Walker v. Daniels
...(1963) (Bailey I ); Morehouse College v. Russell, 109 Ga.App. 301, 136 S.E.2d 179 (1964). See also Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. McGivern, 132 Ga.App. 297, 301(2), 208 S.E.2d 258 (1974), holding that violation of a county ordinance regulating the usage of semi-public pools is negligenc......
-
Heath v. McGuire
...whether under any contingency the matter may raise an issue, the motion should be denied. [Cits.]" Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. McGivern, 132 Ga.App. 297, 302, 208 S.E.2d 258 (1974). After a careful reading of the pleadings involved, we find that the trial court did not err in denying......
-
English v. 1st Augusta Ltd.
...in repair." See, e.g., Carter v. Brannon, 122 Ga.App. 812, 178 S.E.2d 755 (1970). The case of Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. McGivern, 132 Ga.App. 297, 208 S.E.2d 258 (1974) lends further support to the Court's denial of the motion for summary judgment. The case arose out of the ......
-
Georgia's Approach to Proportionality and Sanctions for the Spoliation of Electronically Stored Information
...Cmty. & S. Bank v. Lovell, 807 S.E.2d 444, 447 n.6 (Ga. 2017); Ambler, 196 S.E.2d at 862; Nw. Mut. Life Ins. Co., v. McGivern, 208 S.E.2d 258, 262 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974).65. Compare Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, with § 9-11-26.66. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1); § 9-11-26(b)(1). Georgia Code section 9-11-26(b......