Novom v. Novom
| Decision Date | 13 October 1987 |
| Docket Number | No. 86-1964,86-1964 |
| Citation | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2408,513 So.2d 789 |
| Parties | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2408 Joseph NOVOM, Appellant, v. Thelma D. NOVOM, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Joseph Novom, in pro. per.
Hoffman, Larin & Feinsmith, North Miami Beach, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.
This is a pro se appeal brought by the former husband Joseph Novom from a final judgment of marriage dissolution. He complains that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding the former wife Thelma D. Novom (1) his one-half interest in the marital home, (2) permanent alimony in the amount of $500 per month, (3) $5,700 in temporary alimony arrearages, and (4) attorney's fees and costs.
We affirm the final judgment under review because, simply stated, there is no record of the final hearing in this cause and the final judgment does not on its face reveal an abuse of discretion in these awards. The parties are in considerable disagreement as to the nature of the evidence adduced below, and were not able to reconstruct the record of the final hearing under Fla.R.App.P. 9.200(a)(3), 9.200(b)(3), after the former husband failed to include a court reporter's transcript of said hearing. Under these circumstances, we have no authority to upset any of the above-stated awards. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979); Glace & Radcliffe, Inc. v. City of Live Oak, 471 So.2d 144, 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Pape v. Pape, 444 So.2d 1058, 1061 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Wright v. Wright, 431 So.2d 177, 178 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Lambert v. Lambert, 340 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Schmidt v. Schmidt
...be affirmed."); see also Marshall, 953 So.2d at 25; Mayfield v. Mayfield, 929 So.2d 671, 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Novom v. Novom, 513 So.2d 789, 790 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). In doing so, we find no error in the trial court's rulings concerning the distribution of the money market account the res......
-
Thomas v. Perkins, No. 98-385
...court abused its discretion and must therefore affirm. See Girtman v. Girtman, 693 So.2d 631, 632 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Novom v. Novom, 513 So.2d 789, 790 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). ...
-
Chatman v. London
...9.200(b)(4). Because the order on its face does not reveal any abuse of discretion, we affirm the award of fees. See Novom v. Novom, 513 So.2d 789 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). THREADGILL, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur. ...
-
Suarez v. Perez-Borroto
...and FERGUSON, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Palma, 524 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Novom v. Novom, 513 So.2d 789 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Good Samaritan Hospital Association v. Saylor, 495 So.2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Baker v. Varela, 416 So.2d 1190 (Fla. ......