Nuno v. Balz
| Decision Date | 28 June 1972 |
| Docket Number | No. 41887,41887 |
| Citation | 265 So.2d 10 |
| Parties | Julia Noda NUNO, Petitioner, v. Barry EDWARD BALZ and Allstate Insurance Co., Respondents. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Third District, 255 So.2d 714.
Robert C. Lane, Jr. of Bolles, Goodwin, Ryskamp & Ware, Miami, for petitioner.
David L. Willing, of Adams, George & Wood, Miami, for respondents.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. Therefore, the writ is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Gibson v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc.
...as it applied to Arata and Avis. The district court affirmed, citing Nuno v. Balz, 255 So.2d 714 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971) cert. dismissed 265 So.2d 10 (Fla.1972), and Pass v. Friedman, 140 So.2d 883 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962) cert. denied 146 So.2d 752 This Court has certiorari jurisdiction based on conf......