Obenschain v. Williams

Decision Date16 February 2000
Docket NumberNo. 1D99-1074.,1D99-1074.
Citation750 So.2d 771
PartiesJacqueline OBENSCHAIN and Advocacy Center for Persons With Disabilities, Inc., Appellants, v. Robert B. WILLIAMS, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Florida State Hospital, Gilbert Ferris, in his official capacity as an employee of the State of Florida Department of Children And Family Services, Cuong Ba Nguyen, in his official capacity as an employee of the State of Florida Department of Children and Family Services, Kathleen Kearney, in her official capacity as Secretary of the State of Florida Department of Children and Family Services, State of Florida Department of Children and Family Services, Inc., and Kenneth Kleier, in his capacity as the guardian advocate of Jacqueline Obenschain, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Gordon B. Scott of Advocacy Center for Persons With Disabilities, Inc., and James Vernon Cook, Tallahassee, for Appellants.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Jason Vail, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellees.

BROWNING, J.

Appellant, Jacqueline Obenschain, appeals the trial court's final order dismissing her second amended complaint with prejudice. Appellant argues the trial court erred both by holding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction, and by dismissing her complaint with prejudice without leave to amend, for failure to state a cause of action. We agree with both arguments and reverse.

Appellant filed a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, and a petition for writ of habeas corpus under the provisions of section 394.459(8)(b), Florida Statutes. Sections 26.012(2)(b) and 394.459(8)(b), Florida Statutes (1996), grant the trial court jurisdiction to hear Appellant's claims. Thus, the trial court erred in finding it lacked subject matter jurisdiction.

Appellant filed her complaint on August 8, 1997. Before service of the complaint on Appellees, Appellant filed an amended complaint, as a matter of right, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.190(a), in order to update factual allegations. The lower court dismissed the amended complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to name a necessary party. Appellant filed a second amended complaint to include the necessary party. The trial court then dismissed Appellant's second amended complaint with prejudice and without leave to amend, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and for failure to state causes of action. In so doing, the trial court abused its discretion.

Dismissal of a complaint with prejudice is a severe sanction which should be granted only when the pleader has failed to state a cause of action, and it conclusively appears that there is no possible way to amend the complaint to state a cause of action. Madison County v. Foxx, 636 So.2d 39, 51 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Gowan v. Bay County, 744 So.2d 1136 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Instead, the pleader should be given an opportunity to amend the defective pleading. Gowan, supra. A court should not dismiss a complaint with prejudice if it is actionable on any ground. Wilson v. News-Press Publishing Co., 738 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Dockery v. Florida Democratic Party, 719 So.2d 9 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Dismissal with...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Barley v. Ward
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 1 Noviembre 2019
    ...in limited circumstances." Banks v. Alachua Cty. Sch. Bd. , 275 So. 3d 214, 214 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (citing Obenschain v. Williams , 750 So. 2d 771, 772-73 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) ). Typically, the statute of limitations is properly raised as an affirmative defense. Goodwin v. Sphatt , 114 So. ......
  • McAlpin v. Roberts
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 20 Julio 2016
    ...and it conclusively appears that there is no possible way to amend the complaint to state a cause of action.” Obenschain v. Williams, 750 So.2d 771, 772–73 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). The opportunity to amend should be liberally granted and should not be denied unless the privilege has been abused......
  • Crawford v. Monroe Cnty.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 24 Mayo 2023
    ...have not abused their privilege to amend, and there is no showing that an amendment would prejudice Appellees"); Obenschain v. Williams, 750 So.2d 771, 772-73 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) ("Dismissal with prejudice is a severe sanction which should be granted only when the pleader has failed to stat......
  • Banks v. Alachua Cnty. Sch. Bd., 1D18-2128
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 24 Junio 2019
    ...prejudice. Dismissal of a complaint with prejudice is a severe sanction to be used in limited circumstances. Obenschain v. Williams , 750 So. 2d 771, 772-73 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (holding a complainant should generally be given leave to amend a defective complaint except where the complaint f......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT