Ober v. Pratte

Decision Date30 April 1821
Citation1 Mo. 80
PartiesOBER v. PRATTE.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY

COOK, J.

The material evidence in this cause was contained in a deposition, which the bill of exceptions shows was taken and certified by a justice of the peace of the city of New Orleans, under and by virtue of a rule of the clerk of the Circuit Court of St Louis county, directed to any judge or justice of the peace of the city of New Orleans. To the reading of which the defendant's counsel objected, and now assigns as error that the Circuit Court permitted it to be read on the trial. The statute which regulates the taking of depositions, provides that they may be taken, in certain cases, before any judge or justice of the peace of any of the United States or Territories, upon a rule to be entered up in court, or in vacation, by the clerk. The objections to the deposition in this case are, that the dedimus is not directed to any judge or justice of the peace of any of the United States or Territories; and that the deposition does not appear to have been taken before, nor certified by, any such judge or justice of the peace. It is the opinion of this court that to warrant the reading of any deposition, on a trial in court, it should purport to have been taken in conformity to the provisions of the statute; and the question to be deceided is, does the deposition in this case appear to have been so taken? This court can judicially notice the several State constitutions and the acts of Congress organizing territorial governments; and therefore, must notice that there is no State or Territory in the United States established and known by the name of the city of New Orleans. In order, then, to recognize this justice of the peace as a justice of the State of Louisiana, as has been contended, or of any other State, we must judicially take notice of the law of such State incorporating such city, and that the city of New Orleans is a municipal subdivision of the State of Louisiana. This would be going the full length of taking judicial notice of the acts of the several State Legislatures, a doctrine which, we believe, has been but little countenanced in any of the State courts. What would be the best evidence of the character of the officer before whom a deposition is so taken, need not be decided in this case. The certificate of the judge or justice himself, that is, a judge or justice of the peace of the State or Territory under the authority by...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • St. Louis National Bank v. Flanagan
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 18, 1895
    ...Adams v. Railroad, 74 Mo. 533; Chillicothe v. Raynard, 80 Mo. 185. (16) Hammett's deposition was not admissible. R. S., sec. 4461; Ober v. Pratte, 1 Mo. 80; State Hays, 78 Mo. 606; Grinnan v. Mockbee, 29 Mo. 345; Carpenter v. Lippitt, 77 Mo. 242. Hiram J. Grover, with whom is George Webster......
  • Borders v. Barber
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 30, 1884
    ...plaintiff are manifest errors for which alone the cause should be reversed. McLean v. Thorp, 4 Mo. 257; R. S. 1879, §§ 2152, 2153; Ober v. Pratte, 1 Mo. 80; Leak v. Elliot, 4 Mo. 446; Riggin v. Collier, 6 Mo. 568; Hite v. Lenhart, 7 Mo. 22; Cox v. St. Louis, 15 Mo. 431; Mooney v. Kennett, 1......
  • Southern Illinois & M. Bridge Co. v. Stone
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 4, 1903
    ...must be introduced in evidence at the trial. This has been the rule of decision since the first volume of our reported decisions. Ober v. Pratte (1836) 1 Mo. 80; Mooney v. Kennett, 19 Mo. 551, 61 Am. Dec. 576; Morrissey v. Wiggins Ferry Co., 47 Mo. 521; Flato v. Mulhall, 72 Mo. 522. We must......
  • State ex rel. Kemp v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 7, 1886
    ... ... Haggard v. Railroad, 63 Mo. 302; Spurlock v ... Dougherty, 81 Mo. 180; State v. Bench, 68 Mo ... 78; Robinson v. Jones, 71 Mo. 582; Ober v ... Pratt, 1 Mo. 80; Southgate v. Railroad, 61 Mo ... 89; Baurman v. Railroad, 26 Mo. 441; Butler v ... Robinson, 75 Mo. 192; Fire Dept. v ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT