Obrecht v. Cerro Gordo County Zoning Bd. of Adjustment
Decision Date | 20 January 1993 |
Docket Number | No. 91-1724,91-1724 |
Citation | 494 N.W.2d 701 |
Parties | Leah OBRECHT and Michael McKiness, Appellees, v. CERRO GORDO COUNTY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, Appellant. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Paul L. Martin, County Atty., and Jeffrey D. Lester, Asst. County Atty., Mason City, for appellant.
Matthew F. Berry, Clear Lake, for appellees.
Considered by LARSON, P.J., and CARTER, LAVORATO, NEUMAN, and ANDREASEN, JJ.
A county zoning board of adjustment appeals from a district court judgment that annulled the board's grant of a conditional special use permit. The ordinance specifies that the application for such permits "shall be filed by the owner or owners having title" to the property for which a permit is sought. The district court annulled the permit because the lessee rather than the legal title holder signed the application. We reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings.
Cerro Gordo County has enacted a comprehensive zoning ordinance. See Iowa Code § 358A.3 (1989). Article 20 of that ordinance governs special uses. Article 20.1 empowers the county's zoning board of adjustment to grant special exceptions to established zoning ordinances through the issuance of special use permits. See Iowa Code § 358A.10. Article 18.12(A) provides who may file an application for these permits.
In June 1991 Yohn Ready Mix, Inc., applied to the board for a special use permit. Yohn needed the permit because it wished to establish (1) an operation for the processing of limestone, sand, and gravel, and (2) a concrete production facility. Both businesses were to be conducted on the same tract of land in Cerro Gordo County. The land was zoned originally for agricultural use. It is located in a semi-rural area and is bounded on both sides by residential property.
Jeffrey Nicholas of Nicholas Farms, Inc., holds legal title to the land. The Nicholas family has owned the land for several generations and leases it to Yohn. Yohn also holds an option to purchase the land. Nicholas did not sign Yohn's application for the special use permit.
After notice to affected property owners, the board held a public hearing on Yohn's application on July 16, 1991. Jeffrey Nicholas was present at, and took part in, the hearing. Immediately after the hearing, the board voted 3-1 to adopt a resolution granting Yohn a conditional special use permit.
Leah Obrecht and Michael McKiness own single family residences near the property at issue. The two appeared at the hearing and argued for denial of Yohn's application. On August 12 the two filed a petition in district court to review the board's decision. See Iowa Code § 358A.18 (). In the petition they claimed that the board acted illegally when it granted Yohn the special use permit.
After the board filed its answer, the district court, Judge Gilbert K. Bovard, ordered that a writ of certiorari be issued against the board in connection with the application and permit. See Iowa Code § 358A.19 (). The board responded to the writ by filing all relevant documents and records concerning the application and permit. At the same time, the board filed a motion for partial summary judgment, claiming it was empowered under the ordinance to grant Yohn's application and to issue the permit.
Later the district court, Judge John S. Mackey, held a hearing on the matter. The parties consented to submission of two issues: (1) whether the board acted illegally by granting an application that was signed only by a lessee with an option to purchase rather than by the owner having legal title; and (2) whether the board acted illegally in granting the special use permit when all administrative permits had not been obtained by the applicant. Because the court concluded the writ should be sustained on the first issue, it declined to address the second issue. The court entered "judgment on certiorari" against the board, sustaining the writ and annulling the conditional special use permit. See Iowa Code § 358A.21; Anderson v. Jester, 206 Iowa 452, 463, 221 N.W. 354, 359 (1928) ( ).
Our review under Iowa Code chapter 358A is for errors at law. See Iowa Code § 358A.21; Vogelaar v. Polk County Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 188 N.W.2d 860, 862-63 (Iowa 1971); Anderson, 206 Iowa at 463-64, 221 N.W. at 359 ( ). The findings of fact by the district court are binding on us if those findings are supported by substantial evidence. Vogelaar, 188 N.W.2d at 863.
The only issue in this certiorari proceeding involving a zoning ordinance is whether the board's action in granting the permit was illegal. The burden was on the two petitioners to show this illegality. Deardorf v. Board of Adjustment, 254 Iowa 380, 385, 118 N.W.2d 78, 81 (1962). Illegality is established when the fact findings of the district court do not have substantial evidentiary support, or when the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bontrager Auto v. Iowa City Bd. of Adjust.
...State Bd. of Pub. Instruction, 261 Iowa 1203, 1210, 157 N.W.2d 919, 923 (1968)). More recently, in Obrecht v. Cerro Gordo County Zoning Board of Adjustment, 494 N.W.2d 701 (Iowa 1993), we held substantial compliance with a zoning ordinance was sufficient. In that case, the county zoning ord......
-
Bluffs Development Co., Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of Pottawattamie County, Iowa, 91-593
...findings of the district court are binding on us if those findings are supported by substantial evidence. Obrecht v. Cerro Gordo County, 494 N.W.2d 701, 703 (Iowa 1993). Evidence is substantial if a reasonable mind could accept it as adequate to reach the same findings. Norland v. Iowa Dep'......
-
Christiansen v. Employment Appeal Bd.
...that a technical flaw in the protest does not cause prejudice and it was not error to proceed. See Obrecht v. Cerro Gordo Cnty. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 494 N.W.2d 701, 703 (Iowa 1993) (finding signature by wrong person on form not sufficient to defeat substantial compliance); see also Bro......
-
Christiansen v. Emp't Appeal Bd.
...that a technical flaw in the protest does not cause prejudice and it was not error to proceed. See Obrecht v. Cerro Gordo Cnty. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 494 N.W.2d 701, 703 (Iowa 1993) (finding signature by wrong person on form not sufficient to defeat substantial compliance); see also Bro......