Ocala Star-Banner Co. v. Damron
| Decision Date | 22 April 1969 |
| Docket Number | No. K--86,STAR-BANNER,K--86 |
| Parties | OCALACOMPANY, a Florida corporation, and Loyal Phillips, individually, Appellants, v. Leonard DAMRON, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Loftin & Wahl, Jacksonville, and Greene, Ayres, Swigert & Cluster, Ocala, for appellants.
Wallace Dunn, Ocala, for appellee.
Appellant has appealed a final judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict awarding damages to the appellee in a libel action.
The libel consisted of an item published in appellant's newspaper stating that appellee had been indicted for perjury by the federal government. As it turned out, the publication was false and that it was appellee's brother who had been so indicted and not the appellee himself. A directed verdict on the question of liability was granted, and the case went to the jury on damages only.
Appellant contends that this case is controlled by the recent pronouncements of the federal courts on the law of libel as it relates to the news media typified by New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686, which in essence held that before a plaintiff may recover for libel from a newspaper, express malice must be shown. This principle seems to rest on the proposition that a newspaper has a duty to comment upon the manner in which our public officials perform the duties of their office and that in so commenting, the media is entitled to a greater latitude in bringing out matters concerning such officials which when spoken or written about a nonpublic official or figure might be libelous per se. We have no particular quarrel with that concept when its application is limited to cases giving rise to its emergence.
In the New York Times case, the court stated at 376 U.S. 279, at 84 S.Ct. at 726, 11 L.Ed.2d 706:
'The constitutional guarantees require, we think, a federal rule that prohibits a public official from recovering damages for a defamatory falsehood Relating to his official conduct unless he proves that the statement was made with 'actual malice'--that is, with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.'
The court further stated at page 283 of 376 U.S., at page 727 of 84 S.C t., at page 708:
'We hold today that the Constitution delimits a State's power to award damages for libel in actions brought by public officials Against critics of their official conduct.'
And again in footnote 23 at page 283 of 376 U.S., at page...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hinerman v. Daily Gazette Co., Inc.
...Newspapers, Inc., 541 S.W.2d 809 (Tex.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1123, 97 S.Ct. 1160, 51 L.Ed.2d 573 (1977); Ocala Star-Banner Co. v. Damron, 221 So.2d 459 (Fla.App.1969), appeal dismissed, 231 So.2d 822 (Fla.1970), rev'd on other grounds, 401 U.S. 295, 91 S.Ct. 628, 28 L.Ed.2d 57 (1971)......
-
Bufalino v. Associated Press
...Inc., 541 S.W.2d 809, 815-16 (Texas 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1123, 97 S.Ct. 1160, 51 L.Ed.2d 573 (1977); Ocala Star-Banner Co. v. Damron, 221 So.2d 459 (Fla.App.1969), appeal dismissed, 231 So.2d 822 (Fla.1970), rev'd on other grounds, 401 U.S. 295, 91 S.Ct. 628, 28 L.Ed.2d 57 (1971). ......
-
Ocalaco v. Damron
...knowing falsehood or reckless disregard of the truth. Monitor Patriot Co. v. Roy, 401 U.S. 265, 91 S.Ct. 621, 28 L.Ed.2d 35. Pp. 299—301. 221 So.2d 459, reversed and Harold B. Wahl, Jacksonville, Fla., for petitioners. Wallace Dunn, Ocala, Fla., for respondent. Mr. Justice STEWART delivered......
-
Damron v. Ocala Star-Banner Co.
...Damron initially recovered a judgment in his action for libel against the Ocala Star-Banner. This Court sustained the judgment appealed. 221 So.2d 459 (1 Fla.App. 1969). The Federal Supreme Court granted certiorari and reversed. 401 U.S. 295, 91 S.Ct. 628, 28 L.Ed.2d 57 (1971). The trial ju......