Ocean View Towers, Inc. v. First Fidelity Sav. and Loan Ass'n

Decision Date09 March 1988
Docket NumberNo. 87-0127,87-0127
Citation13 Fla. L. Weekly 649,521 So.2d 325
Parties13 Fla. L. Weekly 649 OCEAN VIEW TOWERS, INC., Appellant, v. FIRST FIDELITY SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Michael W. Moskowitz and Monica I. Salis of Borkson, Simon & Moskowitz, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Christopher K. Kay and James A. Burt of Swann and Haddock, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.

HERSEY, Chief Judge.

Appellant, Ocean View Towers, Inc. (Ocean View), appeals from a judgment of foreclosure of a mortgage securing a $3.6 million dollar loan entered in favor of First Fidelity Savings and Loan Association (Fidelity). Ocean View contends that the mortgage was part of a complicated and unusual program negotiated with Mr. Carl Guffin of Fidelity involving two loans: one for $13 million and the one in question for $3.6 million. The $13 million loan was successfully paid off; however, Ocean View defaulted on the $3.6 million loan. Ocean View alleges that the default was the result of Fidelity's failure to honor an oral agreement entered into with Carl Guffin prior to his departure from Fidelity which involved the creation of an interest reserve for the $3.6 million loan.

There is substantial conflict in the testimony regarding the interest reserve. However, there is no documentation either in letters or memos reflecting any agreement for the creation of an interest reserve.

In Blue Lakes Apartments, Ltd. v. George Gowing, Inc., 464 So.2d 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), this court held that a court of appeal must disregard conflicting evidence and accept facts in evidence which are most favorable to the party that prevailed below. Further, the appellate court is not to substitute its judgment for that of the trial court as long as there is sufficient competent evidence to support its decision. See Diversified Commercial Developers v. Formrite, Inc., 450 So.2d 533 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

It is well settled that a trial court's discretion is abused when the judicial action taken is arbitrary, fanciful or unreasonable. Roberto v. Allstate Insurance Company, 457 So.2d 1148 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Judicial discretion does not mean that

a court may act, or fail to act, according to the mere whim or caprice of the presiding judge, but it means a discretion exercised within the limits of the applicable principles of law and equity, and the exercise of which, if clearly arbitrary, unreasonable, or unjust, when tested in the light of such principles, amounting to an abuse of such discretion, may be set aside on appeal.

Ellard v....

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Villas of Lake Jackson, Ltd. v. Leon County
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Florida
    • February 10, 1995
    ...relief have the equities in his or her favor, or what is referred to as "clean hands." Ocean View Towers, Inc. v. First Fidelity Sav. and Loan Ass'n, 521 So.2d 325, 326 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).152 The "clean hands" maxim and the equitable principle for which it stands signify that a litigant ma......
  • General Development Corp. v. Binstein
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • July 30, 1990
    ...from their clients. See Transcript of Dec. 11, 1989 proceedings, at 54 (citing, e.g., Ocean View Towers, Inc. v. First Fidelity Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 521 So.2d 325, 326 (Fla.App. 4th Dist.1988)).4 One treatise has explained the uncleanhands doctrine as whenever a party who seeks to set the jud......
  • Fla. Assoc.s Capital Enter.s LLC v. Sundale
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of Florida
    • October 8, 2010
    ...signed Mr. Scutieri, and, ergo, Sundale, knew about the alleged misrepresentations and nonetheless proceeded with the Ocean Bank closing.12 First, at the time of its execution of the Ocean Bank Loan Documents, Mr. Scutieri, on behalf of Sundale, was a sophisticated and experienced business ......
  • Mineo Salcedo Law Firm, P.A. v. Cesard
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 12, 2022
    ...a party is found to have unclean hands, the court has more latitude to fashion its remedy. See Ocean View Towers, Inc. v. First Fid. Sav. & Loan Ass'n , 521 So. 2d 325, 326 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). "It is certainly beyond question that ‘one who comes into equity must come with clean hands else ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT