Odom v. Odom, 4 Div. 61

Decision Date11 May 1961
Docket Number4 Div. 61
Citation130 So.2d 10,272 Ala. 164
PartiesWilliam P. ODOM v. Sue Core ODOM.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

W. G. Hardwick, Dothan, for appellant.

Lee & McInish, Dothan, for appellee.

STAKELY, Justice.

The question for decision is whether the contest of a will was made within the six months after the admission of a will to probate as provided in § 64, Title 61, Code of 1940.

Dr. William P. Odom filed a contest in the Circuit Court of Houston County, Alabama, in Equity, contesting the purported last will and testament of Dr. J. W. Odom, which was probated on the 25th day of February, 1960, in the Probate Court of Houston County, Alabama.

Sue Core Odom (appellee) demurred to the bill of complaint on the ground that the contest had not been filed within the six months as required by the statute, the contest having been filed on August 26, 1960. The court sustained the demurrer to the bill of complaint and dismissed the bill of complaint. This appeal followed.

Any will contest filed in the circuit court in equity must be filed within the six months after the admission of such will to probate. Section 64, Title 61, Code of 1940; Ex parte Pearson, 241 Ala. 467, 3 So.2d 5. 'Month' within the meaning of the statute means a calendar month. Bartol v. Calvert, 21 Ala. 42; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Reed, 208 Ala. 457, 94 So. 910; Sims v. Sims, 210 Ala. 465, 98 So. 462; 86 C.J.S. Time § 10, pp. 837-838. A calendar month, according to Webster's New International Dictionary, means "the time from any day of any of the months as adjusted in the calendar to the corresponding day (if any; if not, to the last day) of the next month." Daniel v. Ormand, 26 Ala.App. 441, 442, 163 So. 361 certiorari denied 231 Ala. 10, 163 So. 362.

Furthermore the statute providing for a will contest in an equity court is not one of limitation but creates a new, substantive and independent right which may be exercised within the time prescribed. Smith v. Bryant, 263 Ala. 331, 82 So.2d 411.

The time within which a will contest may be filed in the circuit court, in equity, is computed by excluding the first day and including the last. Section 12, Title 1, Code of 1940.

In the case of Sims v. Sims, 210 Ala. 465, 98 So. 462, this court considered the computation of time with reference to voluntary abandonment as a ground for divorce and affirmed the action of the lower court in overruling the demurrer to the bill of complaint. We quote from that case as follows: 'The bill fixes the abandonment on February 19, 1921, and the bill was filed February 20, 1923. Therefore, excluding the 19th day of February, 1921, and the 20th day of February, 1923, we have two complte years. In other words, start by including February 20, 1921, the day after the abandonment, and we have one full calendar year at the end of February 19, 1922; then start with February 20, 1922, and we have another full year upon the expiration of February 19, 1923, the day previous to filing the bill.'

As stated, the will in the present case was probated on February 25, 1960. Applying the statutory method of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Steele v. Sullivan
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 7 Febrero 1986
    ... ... 61", § 52; Code 1975, § 43-1-70.)\" (Emphasis added.) ...  \xC2" ... 61, Code 1940, a predecessor of § 43-8-199, supra); Odom v. Odom, 272 Ala. 164, 130 So.2d 10 (1961); Wachter v ... ...
  • Ex parte Barrows
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 7 Mayo 2004
    ...or legal holiday, then the period runs until the end of the next day that is not a weekend day or holiday), and Odom v. Odom, 272 Ala. 164, 165, 130 So.2d 10, 10 (1961)(quoting Webster's New International Dictionary for the definition of a calendar month, within the meaning of the statutory......
  • Grice v. Taylor
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 12 Julio 1962
    ... ... GRICE et al ... Thomas J. TAYLOR et al ... 1 Div. 25 ... Supreme Court of Alabama ... July 12, 1962 ... See slso Odom v. Odom, 272 Ala. 164, 130 So.2d 10, and cases therein ... ...
  • Shepherd Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Bedford
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 16 Noviembre 1961
    ...lien claim on April 29, 1960, which is within the six months period required by the statute. Section 2, Title 1, Code of 1940; Odom v. Odom, Ala., 130 So.2d 10. We conclude that Hugh Herbertson is entitled to a lien on the property on each of the six lots for the materials furnished and lab......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT