Odom v. Odom
| Decision Date | 28 June 1978 |
| Docket Number | No. 33422,33422 |
| Citation | 246 S.E.2d 308,241 Ga. 451 |
| Parties | ODOM v. ODOM. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Mullis, Reynolds, Marshall & Horne, Gerald S. Mullis, William D. Acey, Macon, for appellant.
Westmoreland, Patterson & Moseley, Stewart R. Brown, Macon, for appellee.
This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Bibb County which awarded the appellee $600 in attorney fees.
Appellee-wife filed an action for divorce against the appellant-husband. A divorce was granted the parties on grounds that the marriage was irretrievably broken, however, the issues of alimony and support were reserved for jury trial. Prior to the jury's verdict, the trial court entered an order reserving the right to set attorney fees for the wife at a later date. Thereafter, the jury returned a verdict awarding permanent alimony which, on January 21, 1977, was made the judgment of the trial court.
The appellee-wife appealed the award of permanent alimony and, on October 18, 1977, in Odom v. Odom, 239 Ga. 830, 239 S.E.2d 20 (1977), the judgment was affirmed. The remittitur from this court was Filed in the superior court on November 17, 1977. On November 23, 1977, a hearing was held on appellee's application for attorney fees and, on that same date, an order awarding the appellee-wife attorney fees was entered. On December 2, 1977, the remittitur from this court in Odom v. Odom, supra, was entered in the minutes of the superior court and the judgment of this court made the judgment of the superior court.
The sole issue before this court is whether the trial court erred in awarding the appellee-wife attorney fees after an appeal had been taken from the trial court's judgment awarding permanent alimony, that judgment affirmed on appeal, and the remittitur from this court Filed in the superior court. Held :
In a divorce and alimony case, the trial court has jurisdiction to award attorney fees after entering a judgment disposing of all other issues in the case provided the issue of attorney fees has been properly reserved by prior order. Hatchett v. Hatchett, 240 Ga. 103, 239 S.E.2d 512 (1977); Johnson v. Johnson, 239 Ga. 637, 238 S.E.2d 425 (1977); McCurry v. McCurry, 223 Ga. 334, 155 S.E.2d 378 (1967); Crute v. Crute, 208 Ga. 724, 69 S.E.2d 255 (1952); Luke v. Luke, 159 Ga. 551, 126 S.E. 374 (1924).
The appellant contends that although the trial court properly reserved the issue of attorney fees the court was thereafter divested of its right to enter further orders in the case subsequent to the Filing of the remittitur from this court of the appeal in the main case. We disagree.
The appellant cites Bird v. Riggs, 210 Ga. 297, 79 S.E.2d 803 (1954), and similar cases in support of his contention. These cases, however, are not domestic relations cases wherein the issue of attorney fees has been properly reserved by prior order of the court, and, for this reason, are distinguishable.
Our Appellate Practice Act (Ga.L.1965, p. 18) authorizes appeals from judgments and rulings of the superior court, "(W)here the judgment is final that is to say where the cause is No longer pending in the court below." (Emphasis supplied.) Code Ann. § 6-701 (a) 1. In addition thereto, the Act authorizes appeals "from all judgments or orders granting or refusing to grant applications for alimony, Either temporary or permanent." (Emphasis supplied)....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Thompson v. Clarkson Power Flow, Inc.
...Act so as to confer jurisdiction upon this court because the main cause is still pending below. Code Ann. § 6-701(a) 1; Odom v. Odom, 241 Ga. 451, 246 S.E.2d 308 (1978); Ansaldi v. Dexter, 145 Ga.App. 557, 244 S.E.2d 98 (1978). While it is uncomfortable to note that § 54(b) is thus without ......
-
Johnson v. G.A.B. Business Services, Inc., 67663
...subsequent entry of the subject order awarding a specified amount as attorney fees and costs of litigation. See, e.g., Odom v. Odom, 241 Ga. 451, 246 S.E.2d 308 (1978). See also Williamson v. Bank Building etc. Corp., 162 Ga.App. 295(2), 291 S.E.2d 124 (1982); Black v. Sturdivant, 131 Ga.Ap......
- Huff v. McLarty, 33418
-
Baxter v. Baxter
...the final decree was not final until the attorney fees were awarded pursuant to the earlier reservation. She cites Odom v. Odom, 241 Ga. 451, 453, 246 S.E.2d 308 (1978). In that case we were dealing with the finality of an alimony decree and award of attorney fees for purpose of appeal, not......