Ohio Handle & Mfg. Co. v. Jones

• Decision Date: 20 February 1911
• Citation: 135 S.W. 455
• Parties: OHIO HANDLE & MFG. CO. v. JONES.
• Court: Arkansas Supreme Court

135 S.W. 455

OHIO HANDLE & MFG. CO. v. JONES.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

February 20, 1911.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Craighead County; Frank Smith, Judge.

Action by Della Jones, administratrix of George. E. Jones, deceased, against the Ohio Handle & Manufacturing Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded.

J. F. Gautney, for appellant. D. C. Joslin, E. L. Westbrook, and E. H. Mathes, for appellee.

HART, J.

Appellant prosecutes this appeal from a judgment for damages rendered against it in favor of appellee. The undisputed evidence shows that on March 10, 1909, Geo. E. Jones was employed by appellant as sawyer at its mill and was killed while in the performance of his duties as such sawyer. The man who carried off the slabs or flitches as they were sawed was named Barnett. We quote from appellant's abstract as follows: "The machine consisted of a saw table 24 feet long, on which was set at a point about equidistant from the ends of the table a circular saw 54 inches in diameter, driven by steam power. The table was about 4 feet wide, and the saw nearly in the center. The table was so constructed that the saw carriage mounted upon it came flush with the opposite side of table, or the side occupied by the off-bearer. The saw carriage was about 30 inches wide, and 12 feet long. Jones stood on the right-hand side of the table to the right, and 4 feet from the front of the saw. Barnett, the off-bearer, was on the opposite or left side of the table about 2½ or 3 feet to the rear of the saw."

Barnett testified: "Jones cut the logs into slabs. He would first take a slab off the side of the log, then turn the log so that the flat side would rest upon the carriage and rip the log into planks. The log on which he was working was 4½ or 5 feet long. The log must have been half sawed when Jones was injured. The log was perhaps 12 or 18 inches in diameter when Jones first began working on it. I was about 15 feet from Jones at the time he was injured. Jones was killed by one of the pieces that had been sawed by him being caught in the saw carriage, drawn into the saw, and by the saw hurled against Jones." On direct examination, witness testified as follows: "Q. He was not killed by the main log he was sawing? A. No, sir. Q. He was killed by the piece that had been sawed, and had fallen over? A. Yes, sir. Q. What caused it to strike him or go back where he was? A. Of course, in sawing, the flitches nearly always after they pass the saw, those short ones, very often they but little get past the saw. Those saws are 3½ feet or something like that, and some of them larger than that, and the short timber, of course, one end of the flitches barely passes the saw, and then often the short pieces stand there until they run another flitch, and that pushes it on past so we can get hold of it. When the flitch is turned loose, it is my business to take it up and pile it on the rack for the ripsaw."

The slab when it was sawed off the log fell on the saw carriage instead of on the table. When the saw carriage was reversed, the slab was drawn against the rapidly revolving saw, and was thus hurled against Jones. Usually the slab or the flitch falls on the table when it is sawed off the log, and is carried away by the off-bearer. It is usual when a slab falls on the table, and one end will rest against the saw, for it to remain there until it is pushed back by the next slab that comes through the saw. Counsel for appellant claim that the death of Jones was purely accidental, and that appellee is not entitled to recover. We cannot agree with his contention. The testimony shows that the off-bearer could carry away the pieces of lumber as fast as they were sawed, and that it was his business to take them away whenever the saw turned them loose. Just about the time Jones was struck, the attention of the off-bearer was distracted by the ripsawer calling to him and he had turned his head away to answer him. There is a guard which hangs over the circular saw, made of a piece of plank six or eight inches wide. It is right up, over the saw, and is tipped with a piece of gum belting nailed on the lower end, to keep the sawdust from flying back.

Barnett further testified that nine times out of ten the slabs will fall on the table instead of the carriage; that the sawyer stands facing the table looking at his work, and that there was nothing to hinder Jones from seeing that the slab fell on the carriage instead of the table. Other evidence for appellant showed that it was the duty of the sawyer to see that his carriage is free from slabs when he reverses it; otherwise the chances are that some one will get killed by the slab striking the revolving saw. One witness testified that Jones was not looking at his carriage when he reversed it. Another said that there was a blower system in operation which carried away all the dust. On the other hand, an experienced sawyer, who has worked at appellant's sawmill, says there is some dust flying all the time; that the operation of the saw and the...