Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Ryan, L.L.C.
| Decision Date | 24 December 2013 |
| Docket Number | No. 2013–1292.,2013–1292. |
| Citation | 3 N.E.3d 194,138 Ohio St.3d 67 |
| Parties | OHIO STATE BAR ASSOCIATION v. RYAN, L.L.C., et al. |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
William Hicks and Eugene Whetzel, Columbus, for relator.
Squire Sanders, Steven A. Friedman, and Robin G. Weaver, Cleveland, for respondents.
{¶ 1} Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VII(5b), the Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law has recommended that we approve a consent decree proposed by relator, Ohio State Bar Association, and respondents, Ryan, L.L.C., and Brett Koch. We accept the board's recommendation and approve the proposed consent decree submitted by the parties, which provides:
1. Respondent Ryan, L.L.C. (“Ryan”),1 a Delaware Limited Liability Company, is a limited liability company with its principal place of business in Texas. At all times pertinent hereto, respondent Brett Koch was the employee and representative of Ryan.
2. Respondent Ryan, as a corporation or limited liability company, is not, and has never been, an attorneyadmitted to practice, granted active status, or certified to practice law in the state of Ohio pursuant to [R]ules I, II, VI, IX, or XI of the Ohio Supreme Court's Rules of the Government of the Bar. Mr. Koch has never been an attorney admitted to practice, granted active status, or certified to practice law in the State of Ohio pursuant to [R]ules I, II, VI, IX, or XI of the Ohio Supreme Court's Rules of the Government of the Bar.
3. On or about November 18, 2009, Respondents engaged in the unauthorized practice of law by preparing and filing a notice of appeal on behalf of their client, Owens Corning, before the Ohio Department of Taxation Board of Tax Appeals.
4. Respondents' act of the unauthorized practice of law was limited to this single action.
5. Respondents admit that the conduct described in paragraph 3 above constitutes the unauthorized practice of law in Ohio by: (a) preparing and filing a notice of appeal before the Ohio Department of Taxation Board of Tax Appeals; and (b) appearing on behalf of a client before the Ohio Department of Taxation Board of Tax Appeals.
6. It is the desire of the parties to settle this litigation.
7. Respondents were provided notice of the allegations in the Complaint in April 2010, and on May 17, 2010, Owens Corning withdrew the appeal before the Ohio Department of Taxation Board of Tax Appeals. At no time following April 2010 did Respondents provide any additional services to Owens Corning in connection with the notice of appeal.
8. Respondents have fully cooperated with Relator's investigation of this matter.
9. Relator does not recommend the imposition of civil penalties pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VII(8)(B). At the time Respondents entered their representation of their client before the Ohio Department of Tax Appeal, Respondents mistakenly did not understand their act to be rendering legal services under Ohio law.
10. The parties waive the right to notice of an appearance at the formal hearing before the hearing panel.
It is hereby ordered:
A. Respondents are enjoined from all activities that constitute the unauthorized practice of law, including:
(i) representation of a client in Ohio in any court or other forum requiring the representation of a licensed attorney...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Nascar Holdings, Inc. v. Testa
...152 Ohio St.3d 40597 N.E.3d 4142017 Ohio 9118NASCAR HOLDINGS, INC., ..., but an attorney licensed to practice in another state who failed to abide by the Supreme Court Rules for the ... by which legal rights are preserved); Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Misch , 82 Ohio St.3d 256, 259–261, 695 N.E.2d 244 ...v. Ryan , 138 Ohio St.3d 67, 2013-Ohio-5500, 3 N.E.3d 194, and ......
-
Cleveland Metro. Bar Ass'n v. Wallace, 2016–0595.
...and filing of notices of appeal to the Ohio Board of Tax Appeals for others is the unauthorized practice of law (Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Ryan, L.L.C., 138 Ohio St.3d 67, 2013-Ohio-5500, 3 N.E.3d 194 ), Wallaces maintain that they were unaware of this and that Awadallah never informed them t......
-
Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Ryan, L.L.C., 2013-1292
...3, 2014 Ohio Official Reports advance sheet. These opinions should now be cited using the Ohio Official Reports citation format. 138 Ohio St.3d 67, 2013-Ohio-5500. ...