Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Tekulve

Decision Date14 May 1975
Docket NumberNo. 75-1,75-1
Citation42 Ohio St.2d 285,328 N.E.2d 405
Parties, 71 O.O.2d 259 OHIO STATE BAR ASSOCIATION v. TEKULVE. D. D.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

Francis D. DeFrancis, Dayton, Albert L. Bell, John R. Welch, Columbus, and John L. Beckley, McArthur, for relator.

Cors. Hair & Hartsock and Louis J. Schneider, Jr., Cincinnati, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Stein (1972), 29 Ohio St.2d 77, 278 N.E.2d 670, this court recognized the need for consistency in the imposition of discipline in cases of willful failure by an attorney to file an income tax return. We therefore rejected the recommendation of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline that a public reprimand issue, and imposed the discipline of indefinite suspension, stating, at page 81, 278 N.E.2d at page 673:

'One of the fundamental tenets of the professional responsibility of a lawyer is that he should maintain a degree of personal and professional integrity that meets the highest standard. The integrity of the profession can be maintained only if the conduct of the individual attorney is above reproach. He should refrain from any illegal conduct. Anything short of this lessens public confidence in the legal profession-because obedience to the law exemplifies respect for the law.'

The rule announced in Stein was recently upheld in Columbus Bar Assn. v. Dixon (1974), 40 Ohio St.2d 76, 320 N.E.2d 293.

The case at bar is not distinguishable from Stein or Dixon. By willfully violating the law requiring the filing of income tax returns, respondent has acted in clear disregard of law which millions of taxpayers obey yearly, and by his conduct has brought disrespect upon the legal profession.

For the foregoing reasons, the report of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline is affirmed and respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

C. WILLIAM O'NEILL, C. J., and HERBERT, CORRIGAN, STERN, CELEBREZZE, WILLIAM B. BROWN and PAUL W. BROWN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Committee on Legal Ethics of W. Va. State Bar v. Higinbotham
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • 12 March 1986
    ...suspension).7 Ohio State Bar Association v. Stimmel, 61 Ohio St.2d 316, 15 Ohio Ops.3d 389, 401 N.E.2d 926 (1980); Ohio State Bar Association v. Tekulve, 42 Ohio St.2d 285, 71 Ohio Ops.2d 259, 328 N.E.2d 405 (1975).8 Attorney Grievance Commission v. Barnes, 286 Md. 474, 408 A.2d 719 ...
  • Driscoll v. Austintown Associates
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 14 May 1975
    ... Page 263 ... 42 Ohio St.2d 263 ... 328 N.E.2d 395, 71 O.O.2d 247 ... DRISCOLL et al., ... v. Rocky River (1974), 38 Ohio St.2d 23, 309 N.E.2d 900; State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. Berea (1966), 7 Ohio St.2d 85, 218 N.E.2d 428 ... ...
  • Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Kern, 75-7
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 8 June 1976
    ...an income come tax return. See, e.g., Columbus Bar Assn. v. Dixon (1974), 40 Ohio St.2d 76, 320 N.E.2d 293; Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Tekulve (1975), 42 OhioSt.2d 285, 328 N.E.2d 405; Dayton Bar Assn. v. Radabaugh (1975), 43 Ohio St.2d 155, 331 N.E.2d 410; and Bar Assn. of Greater Cleveland v......
  • Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Vaporis
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 16 June 1976
    ...45 Ohio St.2d 57, 341 N.E.2d 302; Dayton Bar Assn. v. Radabaugh (1975), 43 Ohio St.2d 155, 331 N.E.2d 410; Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Tekulve (1975), 42 Ohio St.2d 285, 328 N.E.2d 405; Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Hart (1968), 15 Ohio St.2d 97, 238 N.E.2d 560; Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Bowman (1968),......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT