Ohlhausen v. Sternberg Dredging Co.

Decision Date09 January 1951
Docket NumberNo. 39717,39717
Citation218 La. 677,50 So.2d 803
PartiesOHLHAUSEN v. STERNBERG DREDGING CO. et al.
CourtLouisiana Supreme Court

Jones, Flanders, Waechter & Walker, New Orleans, for plaintiff and relator.

John May, John E. Hurley, New Orleans, for defendants and respondents.

MOISE, Justice.

We granted a writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the Court of Appeal, Parish of Orleans, reversing the judgment of the district court (which had granted compensation to plaintiff under the Workmen's Compensation Act, LSA-RS 23:1021 et seq.), and maintaining defendant's exceptions of no right and of no cause of action. See 42 So.2d 371.

The basis of the exceptions is that the Louisiana Compensation Act is not applicable because (1) The injury did not occur in Louisiana, and (2) The contract of employment was not executed in Louisiana.

Plaintiff is a resident of Louisiana. Defendant dredging company is a Delaware corporation and while its principal office is in Missouri, it is engaged in work of a transient nature through several southern States; it has two branch offices in Louisiana--New Orleans and Morgan City, and for all practical purposes, Captain Paulk, its employee, had full authority to handle its transactions, particularly hiring and firing of employees, without further approval of the company.

The employer-employee relationship between plaintiff and the dredging company began in 1931, in Nashville, Tenn. However in 1941, Ohlhausen left the employ of the dredging company in Florida and returned to Louisiana, where he worked for another company. The first constract of employment had thus terminated. In the latter part of January, 1942, he then wrote to Captain Paulk from Louisiana (Paulk was then in Florida), and asked for his old job with the Dredging Company. The latter informed Ohlhausen that if he went to Jacksonville, Florida, where the dredge 'Duplex' was then operating, he could have his old job back. Plaintiff thereupon proceeded from Louisiana to Jacksonville and joined the dredging crew. The itinerary of the dredge, both within and without the State of Louisiana, from one job to another, is of no moment (except to show that a large part of its engagements were in Louisiana), until the plaintiff's injury, which occurred at Luna Landing, Arkansas, on or about March 1, 1944.

From the foregoing, it is shown that there was a definite contract of employment entered into--in Louisiana. Plaintiff made an offer, defendant made a counteroffer, and plaintiff accepted it by boarding a train in Louisiana and going to Jacksonville, Florida. Regardless of the 'intent' of the contracting parties as to what, if any, compensation law should govern the employment, from the extrinsic facts of the case, we are bound to apply the Louisiana Law.

Once it has been established that the contract...

To continue reading

Request your trial
26 cases
  • Valladolid v. Pac. Operations Offshore
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 13 Maggio 2010
    ...occurring outside state jurisdiction if the employment contract was made within the state. See, e.g., Ohlhausen v. Sternberg Dredging Co., 218 La. 677, 680-81, 50 So.2d 803 (1951) (applying Louisiana workers' compensation statute to injury occurring in Maryland Cas. Co. v. Brown, 131 Tex. 4......
  • Thompson v. Teledyne Movible Offshore, Inc.
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • 7 Settembre 1982
    ...that regard, quoting McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 199 So. 175 (La.App.Orl.1940) at 178-79 in its decision, Ohlhausen v. Sternberg, 218 La. 677, 50 So.2d 803 (1951): Although there is no express stipulation contained in the statute to the effect that it shall have extra-territorial ......
  • Babineaux v. Southeastern Drilling Corp.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • 5 Gennaio 1965
    ...from Louisiana for overseas employment as a result of an offer made to him here in Louisiana, so that under Ohlhausen v. Sternberg Dredging Co., 218 La. 677, 50 So.2d 803, the Louisiana compensation act might be regarded as applicable to his employment relationship irrespective of the 'inte......
  • Tucker v. Texas Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 8 Giugno 1953
    ... ... The defendant replies that the later case of Ohlhausen v. Sternburg Dredging Co., 218 La. 677, 50 So.2d 803, departed from the intent theory of the McKane ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT