Okla. City Ry. Co. v. Diab
| Decision Date | 26 September 1911 |
| Docket Number | Case Number: 1138 |
| Citation | 1911 OK 313,118 P. 351,30 Okla. 32 |
| Parties | OKLAHOMA CITY RY. CO. v. DIAB. |
| Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
¶0 CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE--Last Clear Chance. The syllabus is the same as in Oklahoma City Railway Company v. Saida Barkett, ante, 118 P. 350, just decided.
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; George W. Clark, Judge.
Action by Rosa Diab against the Oklahoma City Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Reversed and remanded.
Shartel, Keaton & Wells, for plaintiff in error
Wm. L. McCann and S. A. Byers, for defendant in error
¶1 This case arises out of the same accident as the Saida Barkett case, which has just been decided, Oklahoma City Railway Company v. Barkett, ante, 118 P. 350. The cases were tried together in the lower court, although separate verdicts were rendered, and the cases have been briefed and argued orally together in this court.
¶2 The instruction complained of in this case is identical with the instruction complained of in the Barkett case, and for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case this should also be reversed and remanded.
¶3 By the Court: It is so ordered.
¶4 All the Justices concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Metro. Ry. Co. v. Fonville
...from the consequences of his contributory negligence, unless he was actually discovered. This case was followed in Oklahoma City Ry. Co. v. Diab, 30 Okla. 32, 118 P. 351. The cases of A., T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Baker, 21 Okla. 51, 95 P. 433, 16 L.R.A. (N.S.) 825, and Clark v. St. L. & S. F. R......
-
Oklahoma City Ry. Co. v. Diab
...118 P. 351 30 Okla". 32, 1911 OK 313 OKLAHOMA CITY RY. CO. v. DIAB. Supreme Court of OklahomaSeptember 26, 1911 ... Syllabus ... by the Court ... The ... syllabus is the same as in Oklahoma City Railway Company ... v. Saida Barkett, 118 P. 350, just decided ... \xC2" ... ...