Oklahoma ex rel. Jones v. Hopkins
Decision Date | 07 November 1899 |
Citation | 1899 OK 124,59 P. 976,9 Okla. 133 |
Parties | THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA, ex rel. EDGAR JONES, County Attorney of Logan County, v. S. N. HOPKINS, as Territorial Auditor of Oklahoma Territory |
Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
¶0 1. COUNTY BONDS--Registration of--Duty of Territorial Auditor. Section 5 of chapter 7 of the Session Laws of 1895, which authorizes and requires the auditor of this Territory to register and certify to the regularity of the issuance of bonds, involves the performance of a purely ministerial duty and not a judicial function.
2. ORGANIC LAW--Judicial Power--Ministerial Officer. Section 9 of the Organic Act provides that all judicial power of this Territory shall be vested in a supreme court, district courts, probate courts and justices of the peace. Hence, the auditor does not possess and cannot possess any judicial power. His duties under the law are simply to pass upon the regularity or irregularity of the issuance of the bonds.
3. MUNICIPALITY--Term Defined. A county is a municipality, within the meaning of article 2 of chapter 5 of the Session Laws of 1897.
4. BONDS--Valid Issue--Judicial Determination. Where a court of competent jurisdiction has determined the validity of the bonds involved in a proceeding provided by the statute, and has decreed that the bonds were valid obligations and issued in strict conformity with the laws of the Territory, and no objections or exceptions were made to the issuance thereof, and no appeal having been taken therefrom, the decree and judgment of the court is final and conclusive upon all matters put directly in issue, tried and determined in that proceeding.
5. MUNICIPAL INDEBTEDNESS--Bonds--Maturity. A bond or other obligation is due or matured whenever the creditor has the right to enforce its payment, or where the debtor has the option to declare the obligation due, and has exercised that privilege. And, the words "due" and "matured" as used in section 8 of the act of 1895, are manifestly used as synonymous words.
6. SAME--Maturity of Obligations--Statute Determined. There is no legal distinction between the intent and purpose of the terms "subject to call by the municipality at any time," as provided in article 2, of chapter 5 of the Session Laws of 1897, and "redeemable at the pleasure of the county," as provided in section 8, of chapter 10, of the Statutes of 1890. An obligation payable "on call" is equivalent to the expression "on demand" or "when demanded."
7. SAME--Right of Municipality to Refund. Hence, a county or municipality in this Territory has the undoubted right to refund all bonds and other obligations issued under the provisions of chapter 10 of the Statutes of 1890, and under the provisions of article 2, of chapter 5, of the Session Laws of 1897, within the meaning of the provisions of section 8, of the act of 1895, which among other things, provides: "That whenever any bonds shall become due and there is not sufficient money in the treasury to pay the same the proper officers may proceed to issue bonds under the provisions of this act, and apply the proceeds of the sale thereof, in the payment of said matured bonds."
8. STATUTE--Title of Act--Construction. There is nothing in our Organic Act or Statute which requires that the title of the act should be expressive of its contents. And hence, "the title of an act of the legislature will be looked to as one of the means of discovering the purport of a doubtful act, but this will only be in cases of ambiguity and uncertainty in the provisions of the act, and, if need be, to aid in its construction, but it will never be held to control the plain and unambiguous meaning of a statute, nor to explain or restrain its positive provisions."( Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Ry. v. Alexander, 7 Okla. 579.)
STATEMENT OF THE CASE.
This is an original proceeding in mandamus commenced in this court on May 22, 1899, by the Territory of Oklahoma on the relation of Edgar Jones, county attorney of Logan county, against S. N. Hopkins, as territorial auditor of the Territory of Oklahoma, to compel said auditor to register $ 80,000 of Logan county refunding bonds, issued by the board of county commissioners on May 9, 1899.
The petition or application for the writ of mandamus is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sebern v. Cobb
... ... Abbott, Pub. Securities, p. 740, sec. 355; Territory v ... Hopkins, 9 Okla. 133, 59 P. 976; Stewart v. Henry ... County, 66 F. 127; Nat ... 245 U.S. 105, 38 S.Ct. 44, 62 L.Ed. 178; Louisiana ex ... rel. Hubert v. New Orleans, 215 U.S. 170, 30 S.Ct. 40, ... 54 L.Ed. 144; ... ...
-
Rasure, Co. v. Sparks
...is a proper remedy and will lie in such cases is well established in this jurisdiction. Territory ex rel. Jones, County Attorney v. Hopkins, Auditor, 9 Okla. 133, 59 P. 976; Davis, County Judge, v. Caruthers, District Judge, 22 Okla. 323, 97 P. 581; Smock v. Farmers' Union State Bank, 22 Ok......
-
Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs of Day Cnty. v. State
...the purpose of defeating a part of the bond issue of July 10, 1900. Touching this question, this court, in the case of the Territory v. Hopkins, 9 Okla. 133, 59 P. 976, said: "The Court having determined the validity of the bonds involved in this proceeding and having decreed that they are ......
-
Phillips v. Chambers
...by this court. A county is one of those political subdivisions of the state which is classified as a municipality. Territory v. Hopkins, 9 Okla. 133, 59 P. 976. In those jurisdictions in which the question has arisen, it has been generally held that a county, as well as any other political ......