Okun v. Litwin Securities, Inc.
| Decision Date | 08 February 1995 |
| Docket Number | No. 94-1522,94-1522 |
| Citation | 652 So.2d 387 |
| Parties | 20 Fla. L. Weekly D348 Mark and Barbara OKUN, Edith Braunstein, and The National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., Appellants, v. LITWIN SECURITIES, INC., and Felix Smolensky, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Carlson Bales & Schwed and Julie A. Moxley and Curtis Carlson, Miami, for appellants.
Scott M. Bernstein, Miami, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ.
In October of 1992 Mark and Barbara Okun and Edith Braunstein were awarded Eighty Nine Thousand Dollars in an arbitration against Litwin Securities. Prior to the Okuns and Braunstein filing their motion to confirm that award, Litwin filed, and the trial court granted, a motion to vacate the award. The Okuns and Braunstein appealed that order, this court reversed, see Okun v. Litwin, 619 So.2d 995 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), and certiorari was denied. See Litwin v. Okun, 629 So.2d 133 (Fla.1993). In July of 1993, Litwin filed an amended motion to vacate arbitration alleging fraud in the arbitration process. The trial court denied that motion, Litwin appealed, and this court affirmed. See Litwin v. Okun, 636 So.2d 517 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). The Okuns and Braunstein then filed a motion to confirm the arbitration award and sought an award of post arbitration interest. On May 19, 1994, the trial court confirmed the arbitration award and denied the Okuns and Braunstein motion for post arbitration interest. From that denial the Okuns and Braunstein appeal.
Post judgment interest is available as a matter of law once damages have been liquidated by a judgment. See Argonaut Insurance v. May Plumbing, 474 So.2d 212 (Fla.1985). Prejudgment interest must be awarded, where the claim is liquidated, from the date when payment of the claim is due. Metropolitan Dade County v. Bouterse, Perez & Fabregas Architects, Inc., 463 So.2d 526 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). An arbitration award is akin to a verdict, see U.S.A.A. v. Smith, 527 So.2d 281 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), and once an arbitration award is confirmed by the court it becomes, like a verdict, the judgment of that court and interest on that judgment runs from date of its entry until satisfaction of same. See Haskell v. Forest Land & Timber Co., 426 So.2d 1251 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); see also Complete Interiors, Inc. v. Behan, 558 So.2d 48 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 570 So.2d 1303 (Fla.1990). The trial court may not award interest which predates an arbitration award. Pharmacy Management Service v. Perschon, 622 So.2d 75 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Goldberger v. Hofco, Inc., 422 So.2d 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).
Although the trial court properly did not award interest which predated the arbitration award, the Okuns and Braunstein were entitled to prejudgment interest, on the amount awarded at arbitration, from the date of that award in October of 1992, until that award was reduced to judgment in May of 1994, pursuant to their motion for confirmation. 1 The arbitration award liquidated the amount owed the Okuns and Braunstein from the date of its entry until that award was reduced to judgment, thus prejudgment interest was not only proper but was required. See Metropolitan Dade County v. Bouterse, Perez, & Fabregas. See and compare Gadd v. Kelley, 66 Haw. 431, 667 P.2d 251 (1983) (); Gordon Sel-Way, Inc. v. Spence Brothers, Inc., 438 Mich. 488, 475 N.W.2d 704 (1991) (same); see also Recreational Development Co. v. American Const., 749 P.2d 1002 (Col.App.1987) (). The Okuns and Braunstein were also entitled to post judgment interest on the judgment entered pursuant...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. v. Ulrich
... ... Bompey and Ira G. Rosenstein of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, New York City, for Securities Industry Association Inc., Amicus Curiae, in support of Appellant Eaton Vance Distributors ... 5th DCA 1991). We certify that this portion of our opinion is in conflict with Okun v. Litwin Sec., Inc., 652 So.2d 387 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 660 So.2d 713 (Fla.1995) ... ...
-
Lewis v. Haskell Co., Inc., Civil Action No. 98-T-816-N.
...be added for the time between the issuance of the arbitration award and its confirmation by the court. Okun v. Litwin Sec., Inc., 652 So.2d 387, 389 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1995). In Okun, the court held that the plaintiffs who prevailed in arbitration, entitled to prejudgment interest, on the amo......
-
Preserve Estates v. Bryant Contracting Corp., 94-2857
...amount also claimed, it was error for the trial judge to add pre-award interest to the amount awarded by the arbitrator. Okun v. Litwin, 652 So.2d 387 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Goldberger v. Hofco Inc., 422 So.2d 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); McDaniel v. Berhalter, 405 So.2d 1027 (Fla. 4th DCA The fac......
-
Keyes Co. v. Spencer
...the arbitration award, which was September 5, 2006. We agree. The law governing this issue was set out in Okun v. Litwin Securities, Inc., 652 So.2d 387, 388-89 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), as Prejudgment interest must be awarded, where the claim is liquidated, from the date when payment of the clai......
-
Prejudgment and postjudgment interest: what's in a name?
...an award for prejudgment or postverdict interest with respect to noneconomic damages in tort cases, in Okun v. Litwin Securities, Inc., 652 So. 2d 387 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), the Third District awarded prejudgment interest to the prevailing party from the date of an arbitration award to the dat......