Oliver v. City of Tulsa
Decision Date | 12 October 1982 |
Docket Number | No. 53992,53992 |
Citation | 1982 OK 121,654 P.2d 607 |
Parties | I.L. OLIVER, a member of Local 176, International Association of Firefighters for and on behalf of the members of said Association, Appellee, v. CITY OF TULSA, Oklahoma, a municipal corporation, Appellant, and Tulsa Fire Chiefs Association, an unincorporated association, Appellant, Intervenor. |
Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
Appeal from the District Court, Tulsa County; Richard V. Armstrong, Trial Judge.
Action for declaratory judgment construing the Firefighters' and Policemen's Arbitration Law, 11 O.S.1971, §§ 548.1 to 548.14, and as amended by 11 O.S.Supp.1972, § 548.4 et seq. From a judgment granted in favor of plaintiff below, appellant City of Tulsa and appellant intervenor, Tulsa Fire Chiefs Association, appeal.
AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART.
Waldo F. Bales, City Atty. by Neal E. McNeill, Asst. City Atty., Tulsa, for appellant, City of Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Chapel, Wilkinson, Riggs, Abney, Keefer & Henson by Charles S. Chapel, Dianne L. Smith, Tulsa, for appellee.
The City of Tulsa (City) is a municipal corporation and a city of the first class under the laws of Oklahoma, operating under a charter approved by the Governor of the State of Oklahoma on the 5th day of January, 1909.
Local 176, International Association of Firefighters (Union) is the exclusive bargaining agent for the "Firefighters" in the City of Tulsa, and I.L. Oliver (Oliver) is a member of that union and appears for and on behalf of the members thereof as well as for himself personally.
Tulsa Fire Chiefs Association (Chiefs Association) is an unincorporated association composed of employees of the City fire department of the rank of District Chief and higher.
Oliver filed suit against City for a declaratory judgment on the issues hereinafter discussed.
Do the provisions of Article XVIII of the Charter of the City of Tulsa, being a charter amendment proposed by initiative petition and approved at a municipal election and by the Governor of Oklahoma, which amendment prescribes longevity pay for firemen, take precedence over the Firefighters' and Policemen's Arbitration Law, supra, so that longevity pay or allowances are not negotiable as between the City and the Union?
City contends that the trial court erred in its holding that municipal employee longevity pay is a matter of statewide concern and therefore the terms of the Oklahoma Policemen's and Firemen's Arbitration Law superseded the provisions of Article XVIII of the City's charter.
We have held that a city charter which is adopted and approved in accordance with the Constitution and which is not inconsistent therewith becomes the organic law of the city and supercedes all laws of the state in conflict therewith insofar as such laws relate to merely municipal matters. 1 As we said in U.S. Elevator, supra,
We find that the longevity pay of Tulsa firemen is a matter of purely local concern. However, the rights afforded by the Firefighters' and Policemen's Arbitration Law, supra, including the right of "collective bargaining" as therein set forth and defined are matters of statewide concern. 2 But the rights therein afforded do not pertain to longevity pay, but only to the privilege of the firemen of speaking through a collective voice to authorized representatives of the City. 3 There is, therefore, no conflict between the charter provision and the statute.
Did the codification of the Oklahoma Municipal Code (11 O.S.Supp.1977, § 1-101 et seq.) which became effective on July 1, 1978, and which specifically repealed 11 O.S.1971, § 548.1 et seq. render the Union's action for declaratory judgment construing the 1971 Act moot and thereby eliminate any justiciable controversy?
It will be observed that the Oklahoma Municipal Code, supra, re-enacts in substantial form 11 O.S.1971, § 548.1 et seq., 11 O.S.Supp.1972, § 548.3 et seq. (see 11 O.S.Supp.1977, § 51-101 et seq.).
When a revised and consolidated act re-enacts in the same or substantially the same terms the provisions of the act or acts so revised and consolidated, the revision and consolidation shall be taken to be a continuation of the former act or acts, although the former act or acts may be expressly repealed by the revised and consolidated act; and all rights and liabilities under the former act or acts are preserved and may be enforced. 4
We therefore hold that the Oklahoma Municipal Code, supra, although it purported to repeal the statutes sought to be construed, re-enacted in substantial form the statutes purportedly repealed, and did not disrupt the continuity of the statutory law or interrupt its force and effect.
Does the Firefighters' and Policemen's Arbitration Law (11 O.S.1971, §§ 548.3, 548.4) and as amended by the Firefighters' and Policemen's Arbitration Law (11 O.S.Supp.1972, §§ 548.3, 548.4) define and determine the make-up of a collective bargaining unit so that whether municipal firemen of the rank of District Chief or higher are included in the bargaining unit is not a matter of negotiation between the City and the duly constituted bargaining agent for the "firefighters"?
The pertinent provisions of the Firefighters' and Policemen's Arbitration Law of 1971, supra, and the contrasting amendment thereof in 1972 are as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Smith v. City of Stillwater & the Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs for Payne Cnty.
... ... Hubbard, 2011 OK 50, ¶ 8, 256 P.3d 69; Cox v. Dawson, 1996 OK 11, ¶ 20, 911 P.2d 272; Oliver v. City of Tulsa, 1982 OK 121, ¶ 25, 654 P.2d 607. ¶ 31 Title 47 O.S. § 11–106(E) limits liability by setting a higher ... ...
-
World Pub. Co. v. White
... ... June 12, 2001 ... As Corrected October 4, 2001 ... J Schaad Titus, Tulsa, OK, for Petitioner, World Publishing Company ... E. Clyde Kirk, Assistant ney General, Brandon D. Watkins, Assistant Attorney General, Oklahoma City, OK, for Respondent, Honorable April Sellers White ... Richard D. Olderbak, ... Public Employees Relations Bd., 1998 OK 92, ¶ 14, 967 P.2d 1214; Oliver v. City of Tulsa, 1982 OK 121, ¶ 18, 654 P.2d 607 ... 23. Title 10 O.S ... ...
-
Raines v. Independent School Dist. No. 6 of Craig County
... ... Oklahoma Educ. Ass'n by Richard B. Wilkinson, Oklahoma City, for appellees ... Rosenstein, Fist & Ringold by J. Douglas Mann and Jerry A. chardson, Tulsa, for appellants ... HODGES, Justice ... This appeal requires ... Independent School Dist. No. 16, 648 P.2d 26, 30 (Okla.1982) and Oliver v. City of Tulsa, 654 P.2d 607, 609 (Okla.1982), or they enforce the contract based on common law ... ...
-
Initiative Petition No. 364, In re
... ... Neal Leader, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Oklahoma City, for State of Oklahoma ... Thomas Dee Frasier, Frasier and Frasier, Gary D. son, Tulsa, for Protestant James C. Thomas ... SIMMS, Justice: ... This ... Oliver v. City of Tulsa, 654 P.2d 607 (Okl.1982). But even the most liberal interpretation will not ... ...