Olmstead v. New England Mortg. Sec. Co.
Decision Date | 07 July 1881 |
Citation | 11 Neb. 487,9 N.W. 650 |
Parties | OLMSTEAD v. NEW ENGLAND MORTGAGE SECURITY CO. |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Error from Butler county.
Phelps & Thomas, for plaintiffs.
E. R. Dean and Hull & Stearns, for defendant.
This is an action to foreclose a mortgage on real estate. The defence is usury. The cause was referred to a referee, who found the issues of law and fact in favor of the defendant in error. A decree being rendered in its favor the plaintiffs bring the cause into this court by petition in error. It appears from the testimony that one A. W. Ocabock advertised in the newspapers that he was making loans in Butler and Dodge counties through one C. C. Cook; that the plaintiff in error Willis A. Olmstead applied to Cook for a loan, and was directed by him to Ocabock to see if the plaintiff's farm, which was offered as security, would be acceptable to the company. Ocabock sent an agent to examine the farm, who, being satisfied therewith, presented the following application for the loan to the plaintiff for his signature:
The above was on a printed form, leaving only the amount, time, county, state, and name of the applicant to be filled out. This was accompanied by a printed form containing a minute description of the farm, which concluded as follows:
Upon this application a loan of $350 was effected; a promissory note, of which the following is a copy, being executed by Willis: “$350. SUMMIT P. O., March 27, 1876. Value received, on the twentieth day of March, 1881, I promise to pay the New England Mortgage Security Company, or order, $350, with interest from date until paid at 10 per cent. per annum, as per coupons attached, at the office of the Corbin Banking Company, 61 Broadway, New York city. Unpaid interest shall bear interest at 10 per cent. per annum. On failure to pay interest within five days after due, the holder may collect the principal and interest at once.
WILLIS A. OLMSTEAD.”
This note had coupons attached, and was secured by mortgage to the New England Mortgage Security, the interest being made payable at the office of the Corbin Banking Company, New York city, on the first day of April of each year. Upon the execution of the note and mortgage, Olmstead was paid $250. In the spring of 1878 he received from Ocabock the following:
This letter is on the same sheet with the circular referred to, and is printed, except the names of Olmstead and Ocabock, and there is printed in red ink across the face of the same the following: The circular referred to is as follows:
Two other circulars of similar import, from the Corbin...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
France v. Munro
...Ark. 40, 14 S. W. 769, 16 S. W. 477, 10 L. R. A. 459; Fowler v. Trust Co., 141 U. S. 384, 12 Sup. Ct. 1, 35 L. Ed. 786;Olmstead v. Security Co., 11 Neb. 487, 9 N. W. 650;Pfenning v. Scholer, 43 N. J. Eq. 15, 10 Atl. 833;Payne v. Newcomb, 100 Ill. 611, 39 Am. Rep. 69; Cheney v. White, 5 Neb.......
- France v. Munro
- Olmstead v. New England Mortg. Sec. Co.