Olsen v. First Nat. Bank
Decision Date | 24 June 1957 |
Docket Number | No. 9609,9609 |
Citation | 83 N.W.2d 842,76 S.D. 605 |
Parties | Frank G. OLSEN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK, a corporation, Executor of the Estate of Mabel E. Olsen, Deceased, Defendant and Appellant. |
Court | South Dakota Supreme Court |
Boyce, Warren, Murphy & McDowell, Sioux Falls, for defendant and appellant.
Louis H. Smith, Sioux Falls, for plaintiff and respondent.
Plaintiff brought this action against defendant bank as executor of the estate of Mabel E. Olsen, deceased, to recover the sum of $2,600.
John A. Olsen executed his last will and testament in due form on October 5, 1942. Paragraph V of the will reads as follows: 'Subject to the life estate in favor of Mabel E. Olsen, I give, devise and bequeath unto Frank Olsen of Sioux Falls, South Dakota, the forty (40) acre farm owned by me and located in Turner County, South Dakota, and in the event of sale and conveyance of said premises by my life tenant and the proceeds of the sale of said premises cannot be readily identified, then this legacy to lapse, otherwise to remain in full force and effect.'
On June 1, 1943, John A. Olsen and his wife by a warranty deed conveyed the forty acre tract to Ernest A. Larsen for a consideration of $2,600.
On November 6, 1944, John A. Olsen, his wife Mabel and his brother Frank met in Sioux Falls. Mrs. Olsen was present during all the time of a conversation between the brothers in an automobile parked near the Shriver-Johnson store. John A. Olsen at that time wrote out and handed to his brother a statement reading as follows:
'South of Shriver Johnson Store
Nov 6 1944----
'in an agreement, John A. Olsen and Mrs. John A. Olsen and Frank G. Olsen we have divided our Estate in 1/2. My share goes to Bros Sisters neices-nehpews and you Frank recd $2600, for Turner County Farm which I sold for $65 pr. acre and this is your money Frank no one can take this away from you this is my wish.
John A. Olsen.'
At the same time there was made and delivered to the brother what purports to be a check as follows:
'Sioux Falls, So. Dak. Nov. 6 1945 No. ___
'First National Bank & Trust Company 78-2
'Pay To The Order of Frank G. Olsen $2600 Twenty Six Hundred Dollars
Pd in full. for 40 acres sold for $65.00 pr acre and. to be cashed after my wifes death.'
Plaintiff received a letter dated December 16, 1944, from his brother John, in which after expressing his appreciation for work done by plaintiff, he said:
Plaintiff received a typewritten letter dated March 7, 1945 and addressed to him at Goldfield, Iowa, from his brother. At the bottom of this letter in John's handwriting is the following: 'Frank be sure to take care of check I gave you on Nov 6, 1944 and this is for Farm in Turner County pd in full no selling. this is my wish to you Frank. cash it after my wifes death. show this to Pankow your administrator.'
John A. Olsen, died on March 25, 1945. The First National Bank & Trust Company, Sioux Falls, qualified as executor. The assets of the estate were appraised at $10,503.96. The final decree was entered February 4, 1946, assigning to the surviving wife all the property either absolutely or for life coupled with a power of sale. Mabel E. Olsen died on October 20, 1954. The assets of her estate were appraised at $75,188.52. Frank G. Olsen presented a claim for $2,600 to R. A. Pankow, trust officer of defendant bank named as executor. After hearing, the county court on July 25, 1955, made an order rejecting the claim.
The cause came on for trial and subsequently the court made findings in favor of plaintiff and decreed a constructive trust. The trial court filed an opinion from which we quote:
'From this record it seems apparent that Ex. 1, in the form of a check, is not effective as a check and was not intended by John A. Olsen to be presented and paid as a check is usually presented and paid. It was post-dated. No provision was made in the bank account to cover it. It was to be presented to Mr. Pankow, trust officer of the bank which was executor of both estates. The wife was to have use of the $2600 during her life and plaintiff was not to receive the amount until after the death of Mabel. * * * 'If the transaction were an attempt to make a testamentary disposition of the $2600 it was ineffective as such because the writings involved were not executed in compliance with the formalities required by statute.
* * *
Defendant appeals and urges (1) that the evidence does not sustain the findings of fact; (2) that the claim arising upon contract and payable from the assets of the estate of John A. Olsen is now barred by statute; (3) that necessary and indispensable parties were not before the court; and (4) that statements made by decedents to plaintiff were inadmissible.
Appellant asserts that the evidence does not supply the essential elements of a constructive trust and that the trial court erred in decreeing such trust in favor of the plaintiff. Cases have been cited by counsel for appellant in support of their contention that no money belonging to the plaintiff was traced and identified as a separate entity or as a part of an identifiable fund. While it is necessary that there be a res or specific fund on which the trust may be fixed, a constructive trust is not a title to or lien on property and in fact does not exist so as to affect property held until it is declared by a court of equity as a means of affording relief. International Refugee Organization v. Maryland Drydock Co., 4 Cir., 179 F.2d 284. It is not technically a trust. In re Zech's Estate, 69 S.D. 51, 6 N.W.2d 432; In re National Benefit Ass'n, 72 S.D. 23, 29 N.W.2d 81; Schwartzle v. Dale, 74 S.D. 467, 54 N.W.2d 361; In re Farmers State Bank of Amherst, 67 S.D. 51, 289 N.W. 75, 80, 126 A.L.R. 619. In the case last cited, the following comment from...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Starzec v. Kida
...94, 98 Cal.Rptr. 293, 490 P.2d 805 (1971), cert. denied 405 U.S. 1041, 92 S.Ct. 1316, 31 L.Ed.2d 583 (1972); Olsen v. First National Bank, 76 S.D. 605, 83 N.W.2d 842 (1957). See comment, 27 Yale L.J. 389 Sound policy seeks to safeguard titles to land and frustrate fraudulent claims against ......
-
Estate of Green, Matter of
...is not based on an obligation owing from John A. Olsen in his lifetime. The claim statute does not apply. Olsen v. First Nat'l Bank, 76 S.D. 605, 613, 83 N.W.2d 842, 847 (1957) (citation omitted) (citing Hirning v. Kurle, 54 S.D. 334, 223 N.W. 212 [W]hen Roberts died there existed against h......
-
Speck v. Anderson, 13054
...shall be filed within the time limited in the notice, and any claim not so filed is forever barred. In Olsen v. First National Bank, 76 S.D. 605, 613, 83 N.W.2d 842, 847 (1957), this court held that the term "claims," as used in SDCL 30-21-17, refers only to "debts or demands which are coll......
-
Potts v. Emerick
...N.W. 702 (1909); Winder v. Scholey, 83 Ohio St. 204, 93 N.E. 1098 (1910); Penza Estate, 59 Pa.D.&C.2d 19 (1973); Olsen v. First National Bank, 76 S.D. 605, 83 N.W.2d 842 (1957). And see G. Bogert, Trusts and Trustees § 499 at 487-93 (rev.2d ed. 1978); I Scott on Trusts §§ 55.1-55.3 (3d ed. ......