Omaha Loan & Trust Co. v. Goodman
Decision Date | 19 June 1901 |
Citation | 86 N.W. 1082,62 Neb. 197 |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
Parties | OMAHA LOAN & TRUST CO. v. GOODMAN ET AL. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Syllabus by the Court.
1. Contract running to a corporation to be formed, and providing for a conveyance of land to it on certain conditions, must be taken as an offer, whose acceptance within a reasonable time, by forming the corporation and performing the conditions, would constitute a valid agreement.
2. An agreement to furnish bond in sum of $150,000 to locate a university, and commence building by May 1, 1888, and complete it by May 1, 1890, at cost of $50,000 or more, “and this and other buildings and campus to be used for university purposes,” is not fulfilled by simply locating and erecting a building of the required cost within the time.
3. Agreement to convey 10 acres of 40 owned by vendor, “being every fourth block in said forty acres,” when the 40 acres consists of blocks 59 and 60, 73 and 74, 75 and 76, and the north half of 91 and 92, is too indefinite and uncertain for specific enforcement.
Appeal from district court, Lancaster county; Holmes, Judge.
Action by the Omaha Loan & Trust Company against Emma Goodman and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Modified.
Congdon & Parish and F. A. Brogan, for appellant.
C. M. Parker, for appellees.
In the year 1887 C. F. Goodman, with others, signed an agreement providing that the subscribers should pay the money and convey the lands and lots opposite their names to secure the location and building of the University of the Christian Church of Nebraska on a certain quarter section of land in Lancaster county. The money was to be paid, one-fourth when half the foundation should be laid, and the rest in one, two, and three years, with 8 per cent. interest. The lands were to be deeded to trustees when the university location should be agreed to by the state convention of the church; the trustees to give a good and sufficient bond to the subscribers that one of the buildings should be completed by January 1, 1890, and “permanently used for the purpose of a Christian university.” Some other conditions were attached. Goodman's subscription was 10 acres of land, wholly undescribed. Subsequently the following agreement was made: It was signed only by Goodman and wife. It appears that the educational board referred to was organized February 14, 1888. No bond was ever given as provided in the agreement. The university was located as agreed, and a building commenced within the time, and finished in April, 1890, costing about $80,000. The deed was not given. At the time of the agreement the 40 acres consisted of blocks numbered 59 and 60, 73 and 74, 75 and 76, and contained the north half of blocks numbered 91 and 92 in Bethany Heights addition to Lincoln, and all belonged to Goodman. In 1899 the board procured appointment of appraisers under the statute, and had their property appraised, including subscriptions and donations, but it did not include this land or contract. C. R. Van Duyn, treasurer, says that Goodman told him that when he could get a blanket mortgage off this land he would deed. Van Duyn thinks this was in 1893. No other claim of right by the board appears, and in 1892 Goodman and wife vacated the plat of Bethany Heights as to this land. October 14, 1893, the plaintiff loan company filed a judgment in Lancaster county against Goodman for $1,099.51, and $17.48 costs. November 4, 1893, the agreement was filed with the register of deeds, and recorded in the miscellaneous records. It was never acknowledged. November 17, 1893, Goodman and wife made a mortgage to the First National Bank of Omaha for $6,000 on this 40 acres and other lands. The judgment of plaintiff appearing on record, its amount was deducted from the $6,000 and indorsed on the note. January 11, 1896, plaintiff commenced suit to set aside an old mortgage and have the property sold on its judgment, making the First National Bank and Goodman's widow and executrix (he having died in 1895), his children, the educational board, and one Robert S. Dill, parties defendant, together with a mortgagee whose lien was alleged to have been satisfied. It asked that all parties be compelled to show their rights and priorities, and a sale had to satisfy its judgment. Dill answered, setting out the facts as to the educational board's claim, and an assignment January 26, 1896, of that claim to himself, and asked specific performance as to an undivided one-fourth of the 40 acres. The First National Bank answered, denying any right in Dill, admitting plaintiff's lien as first, and asking to foreclose its mortgage for...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Holmquist v. King Cnty.
...vacation did not have the legal effect of extinguishing Shotwell's and Müller's contractual rights. See Omaha Loan & Trust Co. v. Goodman, 62 Neb. 197, 86 N.W. 1082, 1085 (1901) (street vacation had no effect on university board's contract to purchase land).12 The actual effect of street va......
-
Young Men's Christian Association v. Morrow
... ... Bacon, 24 Mo.App. 403; McGrew v. Railroad, 230 ... Mo. 511; Goodman v. Griffith, 142 S.W. 258. (2) The ... rule is the same where the action ... ...
- Alter v. State ex rel. Kountze
-
Roberts v. Bennett
... ... 125; Blankenship v. Spencer, ... 31 W.Va. 510, 7 S.E. 433; Omaha Loan & Trust Co. v ... Goodman, 62 Neb. 197, 86 N.W. 1082; Grier v ... ...