One Elmcroft Stamford, LLC v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Stamford
| Decision Date | 30 October 2019 |
| Citation | 218 A.3d 594 (Mem),333 Conn. 936 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | ONE ELMCROFT STAMFORD, LLC v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF the CITY OF STAMFORD et al. |
333 Conn. 936
218 A.3d 594 (Mem)
ONE ELMCROFT STAMFORD, LLC
v.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF the CITY OF STAMFORD et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Decided October 30, 2019
Gerald M. Fox III, in support of the petition.
John W. Knuff and Jeffrey P. Nichols, in opposition.
The petition by the defendants Pisano Brothers Automotive, Inc., and Pasquale Pisano for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 192 Conn. App. 275, 217 A.3d 1015 (2019), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that General Statutes § 14-55 was not repealed in 2003?"
MCDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision on this petition.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
One Elmcroft Stamford, LLC v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Stamford
...of certification to the defendants, Pisano Brothers Automotive, Inc., and Pasquale Pisano; see One Elmcroft Stamford, LLC v. Zoning Board of Appeals , 333 Conn. 936, 218 A.3d 594 (2019) ; the Supreme Court concluded, as a matter of law, that § 14-55 had been repealed by Public Acts 2003, No......