Oneida Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Russell R.

Decision Date27 September 2019
Docket NumberCAF 18–01132,778
Citation109 N.Y.S.3d 786,175 A.D.3d 1793
Parties In the Matter of ONEIDA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Petitioner–Respondent, v. RUSSELL R., Respondent–Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

175 A.D.3d 1793
109 N.Y.S.3d 786

In the Matter of ONEIDA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Petitioner–Respondent,
v.
RUSSELL R., Respondent–Appellant.

778
CAF 18–01132

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Entered: September 27, 2019


PETER J. DIGIORGIO, JR., UTICA, FOR RESPONDENT–APPELLANT.

PETER M. RAYHILL, COUNTY ATTORNEY, UTICA (DENISE J. MORGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER–RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

175 A.D.3d 1793

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent father appeals from an order that denied his application seeking to vacate an order of filiation entered upon his default. We affirm.

The determination whether to vacate an order entered upon a default is left to the sound discretion of the court (see

175 A.D.3d 1794

Matter of Troy D.B. v. Jefferson County Dept. of Social Servs. , 42 A.D.3d 964, 965, 839 N.Y.S.2d 877 [4th Dept. 2007] ), and we conclude that Family Court did not abuse its discretion here. " ‘Pursuant

to CPLR 5015(a)(1), a court may vacate a judgment or order entered upon default if it determines that there is a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense’ " ( Matter of Shehatou v. Louka , 145 A.D.3d 1533, 1534, 44 N.Y.S.3d 299 [4th Dept. 2016] ). "Although default orders are disfavored in cases involving the custody or support of children, and thus the rules with respect to vacating default judgments are not to be applied as rigorously in those cases ..., that policy does not relieve the defaulting party of the burden of establishing a reasonable excuse for the default or a meritorious defense" ( id. [internal quotation marks omitted] ).

With respect to whether there was a reasonable excuse for the default, the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Swazette S. v. Stacey B. (In re Brianna B.)
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 27, 2019
    ... ... , 142 A.D.3d 1322, 1323, 38 N.Y.S.3d 356 [4th Dept. 2016] ; see generally Leon v. Martinez, 84 ... ...
  • Fusion Funding v. Loftti Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 5, 2023
    ... ... court" (Matter of Oneida County Dept. of Social ... Servs. v Russell R., ... ...
  • Rosendahl v. Winn
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 27, 2019
    ... ... , 156 A.D.3d 1358, 1360, 67 N.Y.S.3d 751 [4th Dept. 2017] ; Gizzi v. Gizzi , 136 A.D.3d 1405, 1406, ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT