Oneida Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Russell R.
Decision Date | 27 September 2019 |
Docket Number | CAF 18–01132,778 |
Citation | 109 N.Y.S.3d 786,175 A.D.3d 1793 |
Parties | In the Matter of ONEIDA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Petitioner–Respondent, v. RUSSELL R., Respondent–Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
175 A.D.3d 1793
109 N.Y.S.3d 786
In the Matter of ONEIDA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Petitioner–Respondent,
v.
RUSSELL R., Respondent–Appellant.
778
CAF 18–01132
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Entered: September 27, 2019
PETER J. DIGIORGIO, JR., UTICA, FOR RESPONDENT–APPELLANT.
PETER M. RAYHILL, COUNTY ATTORNEY, UTICA (DENISE J. MORGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER–RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Respondent father appeals from an order that denied his application seeking to vacate an order of filiation entered upon his default. We affirm.
The determination whether to vacate an order entered upon a default is left to the sound discretion of the court (see
Matter of Troy D.B. v. Jefferson County Dept. of Social Servs. , 42 A.D.3d 964, 965, 839 N.Y.S.2d 877 [4th Dept. 2007] ), and we conclude that Family Court did not abuse its discretion here. " ‘Pursuant
to CPLR 5015(a)(1), a court may vacate a judgment or order entered upon default if it determines that there is a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense’ " ( Matter of Shehatou v. Louka , 145 A.D.3d 1533, 1534, 44 N.Y.S.3d 299 [4th Dept. 2016] ). "Although default orders are disfavored in cases involving the custody or support of children, and thus the rules with respect to vacating default judgments are not to be applied as rigorously in those cases ..., that policy does not relieve the defaulting party of the burden of establishing a reasonable excuse for the default or a meritorious defense" ( id. [internal quotation marks omitted] ).
With respect to whether there was a reasonable excuse for the default, the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Swazette S. v. Stacey B. (In re Brianna B.)
... ... , 142 A.D.3d 1322, 1323, 38 N.Y.S.3d 356 [4th Dept. 2016] ; see generally Leon v. Martinez, 84 ... ...
-
Fusion Funding v. Loftti Inc.
... ... court" (Matter of Oneida County Dept. of Social ... Servs. v Russell R., ... ...
-
Rosendahl v. Winn
... ... , 156 A.D.3d 1358, 1360, 67 N.Y.S.3d 751 [4th Dept. 2017] ; Gizzi v. Gizzi , 136 A.D.3d 1405, 1406, ... ...