Oney v. Needham
Decision Date | 11 May 1966 |
Docket Number | No. 39893,39893 |
Citation | 216 N.E.2d 625,6 Ohio St.2d 154 |
Parties | , 35 O.O.2d 223 ONEY, Appellant, v. NEEDHAM, a Minor, et al., Appellees. |
Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
James C. Britt, Joseph S. Deutschle, Jr., Columbus, and Roy J. Gilliland, Jackson, for appellant.
Wiles, Doucher, Tressler, Martin & Ford, Paul Martin, Columbus, and Thomas H. Monger, Jackson, for appellees.
The omission to charge specifically on proximate cause was not called to the trial court's attention, nor was the court requested to charge thereon. Such an error of omission did not justify the reversal by the Court of Appeals. Rhoades v. City of Cleveland, 157 Ohio St. 107, 105 N.E.2d 2. The Judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the other errors assigned in and not passed upon by that court.
Judgment reversed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Charles L. Lorraine, 90-LW-2785
... ... appeal. Snyder v. Stanford (1968), 15 Ohio St.2d 31, ... 238 N.E.2d 563; Oney v. Needham (1966), 6 Ohio St.2d ... 154, 216 N.E.2d 625. * * * " Stores Realty Co. v ... Cleveland (1975), 41 Ohio St.2d 41, 43 ... ...
-
In re T.C.K.
...41 Ohio St.2d 41, 43, 322 N.E.2d 629 (1975), citingSnyder v. Standford, 15 Ohio St.2d 31, 238 N.E.2d 563 (1968), and Oney v. Needham, 6 Ohio St.2d 154, 216 N.E.2d 625 (1966). An appellate court may recognize an error that an appellant waived only if it constitutes plain error. E.g., In re E......
-
Stores Realty Co. v. City of Cleveland, Bd. of Bldg. Standards and Bldg. Appeals
...are waived and may not be raised upon appeal. Snyder v. Standford (1968),15 Ohio St.2d 31, 238 N.E.2d 563; Oney v. Needham (1966), 6 Ohio St.2d 154, 216 N.E.2d 625. Although the issue had never been decided by this court, the rule is well-established that a party may not, upon appeal, raise......
-
In re J.J., 2007 Ohio 535 (Ohio App. 2/8/2007)
...(1975), 41 Ohio St.2d 41, 43, 322 N.E.2d 629; Snyder v. Stanford (1968), 15 Ohio St.2d 31, 238 N.E.2d 563; Oney v. Needham (1966), 6 Ohio St. 2d 154, 216 N.E.2d 625; Nwabara v. Willacy, Cuyahoga App. No. 87724, 2006-Ohio-6414; Swain v. Swain, Pike App. No. 04CA726, Page 10 {¶ 33} Moreover, ......