Oney v. Needham

Decision Date11 May 1966
Docket NumberNo. 39893,39893
Citation216 N.E.2d 625,6 Ohio St.2d 154
Parties, 35 O.O.2d 223 ONEY, Appellant, v. NEEDHAM, a Minor, et al., Appellees.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

James C. Britt, Joseph S. Deutschle, Jr., Columbus, and Roy J. Gilliland, Jackson, for appellant.

Wiles, Doucher, Tressler, Martin & Ford, Paul Martin, Columbus, and Thomas H. Monger, Jackson, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The omission to charge specifically on proximate cause was not called to the trial court's attention, nor was the court requested to charge thereon. Such an error of omission did not justify the reversal by the Court of Appeals. Rhoades v. City of Cleveland, 157 Ohio St. 107, 105 N.E.2d 2. The Judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the other errors assigned in and not passed upon by that court.

Judgment reversed.

TAFT, C. J., and ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, HERBERT, SCHNEIDER and PAUL W. BROWN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
37 cases
  • State v. Charles L. Lorraine, 90-LW-2785
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • 10 Agosto 1990
    ... ... appeal. Snyder v. Stanford (1968), 15 Ohio St.2d 31, ... 238 N.E.2d 563; Oney v. Needham (1966), 6 Ohio St.2d ... 154, 216 N.E.2d 625. * * * " Stores Realty Co. v ... Cleveland (1975), 41 Ohio St.2d 41, 43 ... ...
  • In re T.C.K.
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • 12 Agosto 2013
    ...41 Ohio St.2d 41, 43, 322 N.E.2d 629 (1975), citingSnyder v. Standford, 15 Ohio St.2d 31, 238 N.E.2d 563 (1968), and Oney v. Needham, 6 Ohio St.2d 154, 216 N.E.2d 625 (1966). An appellate court may recognize an error that an appellant waived only if it constitutes plain error. E.g., In re E......
  • Stores Realty Co. v. City of Cleveland, Bd. of Bldg. Standards and Bldg. Appeals
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 29 Enero 1975
    ...are waived and may not be raised upon appeal. Snyder v. Standford (1968),15 Ohio St.2d 31, 238 N.E.2d 563; Oney v. Needham (1966), 6 Ohio St.2d 154, 216 N.E.2d 625. Although the issue had never been decided by this court, the rule is well-established that a party may not, upon appeal, raise......
  • In re J.J., 2007 Ohio 535 (Ohio App. 2/8/2007)
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • 8 Febrero 2007
    ...(1975), 41 Ohio St.2d 41, 43, 322 N.E.2d 629; Snyder v. Stanford (1968), 15 Ohio St.2d 31, 238 N.E.2d 563; Oney v. Needham (1966), 6 Ohio St. 2d 154, 216 N.E.2d 625; Nwabara v. Willacy, Cuyahoga App. No. 87724, 2006-Ohio-6414; Swain v. Swain, Pike App. No. 04CA726, Page 10 {¶ 33} Moreover, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT