Onley v. Shopwell, Inc.

Decision Date21 March 2005
Docket Number2004-04127.
Citation792 N.Y.S.2d 156,2005 NY Slip Op 02236,16 A.D.3d 565
PartiesHILDA ONLEY, Appellant, v. SHOPWELL, INC., Doing Business as A & P SUPERMARKET, et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff slipped and fell on a piece of fruit in the produce aisle of the defendants' premises. In response to the defendants' prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendants created the alleged defect or had actual or constructive notice of it (see Moss v JNK Capital, 211 AD2d 769 [1995]; affd 85 NY2d 1005 [1995]; see also Goldman v Waldbaum, Inc., 248 AD2d 436, 437 [1998]; Katsoris v Waldbaum, Inc., 241 AD2d 511, 512 [1997]). The defendants' general awareness that fruit sometimes fell onto the floor of their premises was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether they had notice of the specific condition which caused the plaintiff to fall (see Halperin v Waldbaum's Supermarket, 236 AD2d 514, 515 [1997]; compare McLaughlan v Waldbaums, Inc., 237 AD2d 335, 336 [1997]; Chin v Harp Mktg., 232 AD2d 601, 602 [1996]).

Florio, J.P., Krausman, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Nyu Hosp. For Joint Diseases v. Country Wide Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 17, 2011
    ...that it omitted numerous items of requested information, and thus was incomplete” ( Nyack Hosp. v. Metropolitan Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 16 A.D.3d at 565, 791 N.Y.S.2d 658; see Westchester Med. Ctr. v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 81 A.D.3d 929, 917 N.Y.S.2d 275; compare St. Barnabas Ho......
  • St. Vincent's Hosp. & Med. Ctr. v. N.J. Mfrs. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 8, 2011
    ...( see St. Barnabas Hosp. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 66 A.D.3d 996, 996-997, 887 N.Y.S.2d 657; Nyack Hosp. v. Metro. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 16 A.D.3d at 565, 791 N.Y.S.2d 658). In opposition, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted......
  • Nyack Hospital v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 21, 2005

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT