Opsahl v. Pinehurst Inc., 432PA86
| Decision Date | 04 March 1987 |
| Docket Number | No. 432PA86,432PA86 |
| Citation | 353 S.E.2d 400,319 N.C. 222 |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | Douglas E. OPSAHL and wife, Hildegard M. Opsahl v. PINEHURST INC., Purcell Co., Inc., and Pinehurst Receivables Associates, Inc. |
Thigpen & Evans by John B. Evans, and Barringer, Allen & Pinnix by Noel L. Allen and Miriam J. Baer, for plaintiff-appellants.
Van Camp, Gill, Bryan, Webb & Thompson, P.A. by Douglas R. Gill, for defendant-appellee Pinehurst, Inc.
Discretionary review improvidently allowed.
Justice WHICHARD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
To continue reading
Request your trial
12 cases
-
Hardin v. Kcs Intern., Inc.
...(quoting Bolich v. Prudential Ins. Co., 206 N.C. 144, 156, 173 S.E. 320, 327 (1934)), disc. review improvidently allowed, 319 N.C. 222, 353 S.E.2d 400 (1987). Hardin has not, however, explained how he would restore Cruisers — which has performed significant repairs, including the installati......
-
Templeton v. Town of Boone
...81 N.C.App. 56, 63, 344 S.E.2d 68, 73, cert. granted, 318 N.C. 284, 347 S.E.2d 465 (1986), disc. review improvidently allowed, 319 N.C. 222, 353 S.E.2d 400 (1987). Therefore, we must determine whether the trial court's dismissal of plaintiffs' claims was "correct upon any theory of law[.]" ......
-
Gilbane Bldg. Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Charlotte Branch
...that projected completion dates are firm is not actionable under the UTPA), disc. rev. dismissed as improvidently allowed, 319 N.C. 222, 353 S.E.2d 400 (1987); accord Bolton Corp. v. T.A. Loving Co., 94 N.C.App. 392, 380 S.E.2d 796, 809, disc. rev. denied, 325 N.C. 545, 385 S.E.2d 496 The s......
-
Walker v. Sloan
...Johnson v. Insurance Co., 300 N.C. 247, 263, 266 S.E.2d 610, 621 (1980)), disc. review dismissed as improvidently allowed, 319 N.C. 222, 353 S.E.2d 400 (1987). Furthermore, "`[a] party is guilty of an unfair act or practice when it engages in conduct which amounts to an inequitable assertio......
Request a trial to view additional results