Opsahl v. Pinehurst Inc., 432PA86

Decision Date04 March 1987
Docket NumberNo. 432PA86,432PA86
Citation353 S.E.2d 400,319 N.C. 222
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesDouglas E. OPSAHL and wife, Hildegard M. Opsahl v. PINEHURST INC., Purcell Co., Inc., and Pinehurst Receivables Associates, Inc.

Thigpen & Evans by John B. Evans, and Barringer, Allen & Pinnix by Noel L. Allen and Miriam J. Baer, for plaintiff-appellants.

Van Camp, Gill, Bryan, Webb & Thompson, P.A. by Douglas R. Gill, for defendant-appellee Pinehurst, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

Discretionary review improvidently allowed.

Justice WHICHARD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Hardin v. Kcs Intern., Inc.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • September 15, 2009
    ...(quoting Bolich v. Prudential Ins. Co., 206 N.C. 144, 156, 173 S.E. 320, 327 (1934)), disc. review improvidently allowed, 319 N.C. 222, 353 S.E.2d 400 (1987). Hardin has not, however, explained how he would restore Cruisers — which has performed significant repairs, including the installati......
  • Templeton v. Town of Boone
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • November 16, 2010
    ...81 N.C.App. 56, 63, 344 S.E.2d 68, 73, cert. granted, 318 N.C. 284, 347 S.E.2d 465 (1986), disc. review improvidently allowed, 319 N.C. 222, 353 S.E.2d 400 (1987). Therefore, we must determine whether the trial court's dismissal of plaintiffs' claims was "correct upon any theory of law[.]" ......
  • Gilbane Bldg. Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Charlotte Branch
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • April 1, 1996
    ...that projected completion dates are firm is not actionable under the UTPA), disc. rev. dismissed as improvidently allowed, 319 N.C. 222, 353 S.E.2d 400 (1987); accord Bolton Corp. v. T.A. Loving Co., 94 N.C.App. 392, 380 S.E.2d 796, 809, disc. rev. denied, 325 N.C. 545, 385 S.E.2d 496 The s......
  • Walker v. Sloan
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • April 18, 2000
    ...Johnson v. Insurance Co., 300 N.C. 247, 263, 266 S.E.2d 610, 621 (1980)), disc. review dismissed as improvidently allowed, 319 N.C. 222, 353 S.E.2d 400 (1987). Furthermore, "`[a] party is guilty of an unfair act or practice when it engages in conduct which amounts to an inequitable assertio......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT