Orange County v. Willis

Decision Date26 September 2008
Docket NumberNo. 1D07-4552.,1D07-4552.
Citation996 So.2d 870
PartiesORANGE COUNTY, Florida and Alternative Service Concepts, Inc., Appellants, v. Thedora WILLIS, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Barbara A. Eagan of Eagan Appellate Law, Orlando, for Appellants.

Douglas H. Glicken, Orlando, and Bill McCabe, Longwood, for Appellee.

BROWNING, C.J.

In this workers' compensation appeal, the employer/carrier (E/C) challenge the Judge of Compensation Claims' (JCC) order requiring them to pay Claimant's attorney's fees for securing payment of several doctor's bills. We reverse.

During the course of Claimant's treatment with Dr. Hanley, an authorized treating provider, the carrier fell behind on making payments to the doctor. The bills were for treatment that had already been rendered, and there was no danger of Claimant's losing access to care. The only evidence was that the E/C's failure to pay the bills was merely a "mix-up." Nonetheless, rather than contact the E/C, Claimant's attorney filed a petition for benefits seeking payment of the bills.

The claim for payment of bills was a reimbursement dispute, as that term is statutorily defined. See § 440.13(1)(r), Fla. Stat. (2006). Consequently, resolution of the claim was within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Agency for Health Care Administration. See § 440.13(11)(c), Fla. Stat. (2006); Avalon Ctr. v. Hardaway, 967 So.2d 268 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). Moreover, Claimant here did not have standing to enforce payment of the doctor's bill. See Hardaway, at 274. As the attorney's fee proceeding is ancillary to the reimbursement dispute proceeding, and the JCC has no jurisdiction to address the motion, the JCC's order awarding attorney's fees is REVERSED.

WOLF and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Marine Max, Inc. v. Blair
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 7 d4 Março d4 2019
    ...Cty. Sch. Bd. , 51 So.3d 619, 620 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (holding JCCs lack jurisdiction over payment disputes); Orange County v. Willis , 996 So.2d 870, 871 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (holding claimant "did not have standing to enforce payment of the doctor's bill"). Moreover, even if the JCC could ......
  • Palm Beach Cnty. Sch. Dist., & Sedgwick CMS, Inc. v. Smith
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 9 d3 Fevereiro d3 2022
    ...Bd ., 51 So. 3d 619, 620 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (recognizing that JCCs lack jurisdiction over payment disputes); Orange County v. Willis , 996 So. 2d 870, 871 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (holding claimant "did not have standing to enforce payment of the doctor's bill"); Wolk v. Jaylen Homes, Inc ., 59......
  • J.B.D. Brother's v. Miranda
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 25 d1 Janeiro d1 2010
    ...of the Agency for Health Care Administration, not the JCC. See § 440.13(1)(r) and (11)(c), Fla. Stat. (2008); Orange County v. Willis, 996 So.2d 870, 871 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); Avalon Center v. Hardaway, 967 So.2d 268, 271-73 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). Moreover, Claimant has no standing to seek pay......
  • Brevard Memorial Park v. Hoodless
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 30 d2 Dezembro d2 2008
    ...and Gray M. Camfield of Camfield & Santomauro, Melbourne, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. REVERSED. See Orange County v. Willis, 996 So.2d 870, 2008 WL 4362397 (Fla. 1st DCA Sept. 26, 2008). WOLF, KAHN and HAWKES, JJ., ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT