Orchard Motorcycle Distributors, Inc. v. Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, Llp
| Decision Date | 06 March 2008 |
| Docket Number | 2995. |
| Citation | 49 A.D.3d 292,2008 NY Slip Op 01996,853 N.Y.S.2d 320 |
| Parties | ORCHARD MOTORCYCLE DISTRIBUTORS, INC., et al., Appellants, v. MORRISON COHEN SINGER & WEINSTEIN, LLP, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
The expert's affidavit was enough to sustain defendant's prima facie burden on the motion for summary dismissal of the legal malpractice claim, shifting the burden to plaintiffs (see Tanel v Kreitzer & Vogelman, 293 AD2d 420, 421-422 [2002]). In opposition, plaintiffs failed to submit their own expert affidavit delineating the appropriate standard of professional care and skill to which defendant was required to adhere under the circumstances, which involved matters arising out of foreclosure actions, complex loan arrangements and bankruptcy proceedings that ordinary jurors could not evaluate based on their own knowledge and experience. There was no prima facie case for legal malpractice (Merlin Biomed Asset Mgt., LLC v Wolf Block Schorr & Solis-Cohen LLP, 23 AD3d 243 [2005]; Schadoff v Russ, 278 AD2d 222 [2000]). The record further demonstrates that the corporate plaintiffs' dire financial situation was brought on by factors independent of defendant's professional representation, rendering the claim that defendant proximately caused plaintiffs' business failure speculative (Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]).
These deficiencies were not cured by the affidavit of plaintiffs' principal, which failed to establish that but for defendant's alleged malpractice, the corporate plaintiffs would have successfully reorganized in chapter 11 proceedings (Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]; Zarin v Reid & Priest, 184 AD2d 385 [1992]). Even if this Court were to consider plaintiff's "failure to advise" claim, an attorney's selection of one among several reasonable courses of action does not constitute malpractice (Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736 [1985]).
The Bankruptcy Court's orders approving defendant's legal fees and expenses established defendant's entitlement thereto (Izko...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Cosmetics Plus Grp., Ltd. v. Traub
...his or her own expert's submission rebutting defendant's expert's opinion ( see Orchard Motorcycle Distribs., Inc. v. Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP, 49 A.D.3d 292, 293, 853 N.Y.S.2d 320 [1st Dept. 2008] ). With respect to whether defendants were responsible for the delay in the ins......
-
Englese v. Steven Sladkus, Esq.
... ... defendants brought in Bovis Lend Lease LBM Inc. as ... third-party defendant. Bovis commenced a ... 76 A.D.3d at 832; e.g, Orchard Motorcycle Distribs., ... Inc. v Morrison n Singer &Weinstein, ... LLP, 49 A.D.3d 292, 292-293 ... ...
-
Koch v. Pechota
...must then offer comparable expert evidence to raise a triable issue of fact. For instance, in Orchard Motorcycle Distributors, Inc. v. Morrison Cohen Singer & Winstein, LLP, 49 A.D.3d 292, the court found that where the defendant's expert affidavit shifted the burden as to standard of care,......
-
Markowitz v. Kurzman Eisenberg Corbin Lever & Goodman, LLP
...as asserted against him ( see Hamoudeh v. Mandel, 62 A.D.3d at 949, 880 N.Y.S.2d 674; Orchard Motorcycle Distribs., Inc. v. Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP, 49 A.D.3d 292, 293, 853 N.Y.S.2d 320; Olaiya v. Golden, 45 A.D.3d 823, 823-824, 846 N.Y.S.2d 604; Napolitano v. Markotsis & Lie......