Orkin Exterminating Co. of South Fla. v. Clark, 70--739
Decision Date | 27 April 1971 |
Docket Number | No. 70--739,70--739 |
Citation | 253 So.2d 884 |
Parties | ORKIN EXTERMINATING COMPANY OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Louis J. CLARK and Patricia Clark, Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Carson & Wahl, and James Knight, Miami, for appellant.
Daniel A. Kavanaugh, Miami, for appellees.
Before PEARSON, C.J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.
Defendant-appellant Orkin Exterminating Company of South Florida, ('Orkin') appeals from a final judgment awarding $7,683.20 (plus interest and costs) for termite damage entered pursuant to a jury verdict.
At issue is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury verdict and final judgment in light of a contractual limitation of liability in the amount of $5,000.00. 1 We affirm the judgment as to liability, but reduce the amount awarded to $5,000.00 (plus interest and costs.) 1
The Clarks sued Orkin for breach of contract and negligence in the performance of that contract. The parties contracted to 'control' a subterranean termite infestation and to 'treat' the Clarks' premises therefor. The contract provided for annual renewal payments of $15.00 covering annual re-inspection after the 1963 treatment.
The Clarks contend that Orkin guaranteed against termite damages during the six year period and that Orkin negligently failed to make proper annual inspections. Orkin generally contends that there was no evidence that the original treatment was improperly performed or that the annual reinspections were improperly performed, and that the $5,000.00 limitation of liability in the contract precluded entry of a larger jury verdict.
A similar argument advanced by appellant was considered and ruled on correctly, we think, in Better Food Markets, Inc. v. American Dist. Tel. Co., 40 Cal.2d 170, 253 P.2d 10, 15--16, 42 A.L.R.2d 580 (1953). Therein it was said:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. Walters
...in tort does not allow Walters to avoid the limitation of liability clause in the contract. In Orkin Exterminating Co. of South Florida, Inc. v. Clark (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1971), 253 So.2d 884 the court rejected a similar approach in the context of a liquidated damages clause. It quoted with ap......
-
Action Orthopedics, Inc. v. Techmedica, Inc.
...clause by suing in tort, and Plaintiff has alleged no cause of action in tort. Defendants rely on Orkin Extermination Co. of South Florida v. Clark, 253 So.2d 884 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). Defendants' reliance is misplaced. Clark can be readily distinguished from the case at bar. Clark involved a......
-
Leonard v. Leo's Exterminating Services, Inc., No. E2009-01398-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. App. 5/27/2010)
... ... See Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Clark, 253 So.2d 884, 884 (Fla. 3d ... ...
-
Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. Montagano, 76-2537
...3d DCA 1972); Kinkaid v. Avis Rent-A-Car Systems, 281 So.2d 223 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973). Furthermore, in Orkin Exterminating Company of South Florida v. Clark, 253 So.2d 884 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971), the court upheld a clause in a termite agreement limiting the termite company's liability to $5,000, ......