Otis v. Butters

Decision Date20 November 1895
PartiesOTIS v. BUTTERS.
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Syllabus by the Court.

A petition in error will be dismissed out of this court when founded upon a transcript not authenticated by the certificate of the clerk of the trial court.

Error to district court, Dawes county; Kinkaid, Judge.

Action by Luke S. Otis against Zeri M. Butters. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. Dismissed.A. W. Crites and A. G. Fisher, for plaintiff in error.

C. H. Bane, for defendant in error.

NORVAL, C. J.

Each assignment in the petition in error, as well as every proposition discussed in the brief, is predicated upon matters disclosed solely by the supplemental transcript filed by the plaintiff in error in this court on July 9, 1894, and which alone contains the purported judgment sought to be reviewed. This transcript cannot be recognized by us, inasmuch as it is not authenticated by the certificate of the clerk of the court below, as by statute required. Following Moore v. Waterman, 40 Neb. 498, 58 N. W. 940, and McDonald v. Grabow, 46 Neb.406, 64 N. W. 1093, decided herewith, the petition in error is dismissed. Dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Forbes v. Morearty
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • April 8, 1898
    ...Neb. 714, 62 N. W. 1084;Martin v. Fillmore Co., 44 Neb. 719, 62 N. W. 863;McDonald v. Grabow, 46 Neb. 406, 64 N. W. 1093;Otis v. Butters, 46 Neb. 492, 64 N. W. 1093;Felber v. Gooding, 47 Neb. 38, 66 N. W. 39;Romberg v. Fokken, 47 Neb. 198, 66 N. W. 282; Railroad Co. v. Kinney, 47 Neb. 393, ......
  • Forbes v. Morearty
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • April 8, 1898
    ... ... Van ... Etten, 23 Neb. 462, 36 N.W. 755; Omaha Loan & Trust ... Co. v. Ayer, 38 Neb. 891, 57 N.W. 567; Record v ... Butters, 42 Neb. 786, 60 N.W. 1019; School District ... v. Cooper, 44 Neb. 714, 62 N.W. 1084; Martin v ... Fillmore County, 44 Neb. 719, 62 N.W. 863; nald ... v. Grabow, 46 Neb. 406, 64 N.W. 1093; Otis v ... Butters, 46 Neb. 492, 64 N.W. 1093; Felber v ... Gooding, 47 Neb. 38, 66 N.W. 39; Romberg v ... Fokken, 47 Neb. 198, 66 N.W. 282; Union ... ...
  • Romberg v. Fokken
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • February 18, 1896
    ...court, and we have no right to ignore or disregard its mandatory provisions. Moore v. Waterman, 40 Neb. 498, 58 N. W. 940;Otis v. Butters, 46 Neb. 492, 64 N. W. 1093;Martin v. Fillmore Co., 44 Neb. 719, 62 N. W. 863;Yenney v. Bank, 44 Neb. 402, 62 N. W. 872. There is another reason why this......
  • Romberg v. Fokken
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • February 18, 1896
    ... ... or disregard its mandatory provisions. (Moore v ... Waterman, 40 Neb. 498, 58 N.W. 940; Otis v ... Butters, 46 Neb. 492, 64 N.W. 1093; Martin v ... Fillmore County, 44 Neb. 719, 62 N.W. 863; Yenney v ... Central City Bank, 44 Neb. 402, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT