Our Lady's Inn v. City of St. Louis
Decision Date | 30 September 2018 |
Docket Number | Case No. 4:17-CV-01543-AGF |
Citation | 349 F.Supp.3d 805 |
Parties | OUR LADY'S INN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri |
Sarah Elizabeth Pitlyk, Thomas More Society, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs.
Robert M. Hibbs, Nolan Ryan Sharkey, St. Louis City Counselor's Office, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on the motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiffs Our Lady's Inn, the Archdiocesan Elementary Schools of St. Louis, O'Brien Industrial Holdings, LLC, and Frank O'Brien, Jr. (ECF No. 13), and the cross motion for summary judgment filed Defendant City of St. Louis (ECF No. 20). The matter has been extensively briefed and is ready for disposition. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs' motion will be granted in part and denied in part, and the City of St. Louis' motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
For the purposes of the motions before the Court, the facts as established by the record are as follows. On February 10, 2017, the City of St. Louis Board of Alderman approved St. Louis Ordinance No. 70459 ("Ordinance"), which prohibits discrimination based on a person's reproductive health decisions1 or pregnancy. ECF No. 20-5. Specifically, Plaintiffs challenge provisions contained in Section Two, subsections B and C of the Ordinance:2
(ECF No. 20-5). The Ordinance also includes a provision stating the following:
Sec. 2(B)(6); Sec. 2(C)(1)(j). Lastly, the Ordinance contains an enforcement provision as follows:
Plaintiff Our Lady's Inn is a Missouri nonprofit corporation that provides housing for pregnant, low-income women seeking an alternative to abortion. Plaintiffs' Statement of Facts ("PSOF") at ¶ 1. Our Lady's Inn also operates a four-family flat that provides transitional housing for women who have completed their stay in a residential shelter and are either working, attending school, or enrolled in a job-training program. Id. at ¶ 2. It leases living space to women who are employees of Our Lady's Inn and serve as supervisors of residents. Id. at ¶ 3. One criterion for employment with Our Lady's Inn is that the applicant support the pro-life mission of the organization; if an applicant does not support that mission, Our Lady's Inn does not consider the applicant to be a good candidate for employment. Id. at ¶ 10. Our Lady's Inn actively engages...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Marianist Province of the U.S. v. City of Kirkwood
...a Missouri state court—that discuss the Missouri RFRA statute. None is particularly instructive here. See Our Lady’s Inn v. City of St. Louis , 349 F. Supp. 3d 805 (E.D. Mo. 2018) (holding that an abortion and contraceptives coverage law that did not exempt employers with religious objectio......
-
HM Compounding Servs., LLC v. Express Scripts, Inc.
... ... Christopher A. Smith, Jason Husgen, Sarah C. Hellmann, Husch Blackwell LLP, Saint Louis, MO, Eric C. Lyttle, Pro Hac Vice, Meghan Ann McCaffrey, Michael John Lyle, Quinn and Emanuel, LLP, ... ...