Outer Banks Contractors, Inc. v. Forbes, 791DC158
Decision Date | 17 June 1980 |
Docket Number | No. 791DC158,791DC158 |
Citation | 267 S.E.2d 63,47 N.C.App. 371 |
Parties | OUTER BANKS CONTRACTORS, INC. v. Sarah E. FORBES and Reggie Owens. |
Court | North Carolina Court of Appeals |
Aldridge, Seawell & Khoury by Daniel D. Khoury, Manteo, for plaintiff-appellant.
Leroy, Wells, Shaw, Hornthal, Riley & Shearin by Norman W. Shearin, Jr., Kitty Hawk, and Ralph T. Baker, Newport News, Va., for defendant-appellee Forbes.
It appears from the notice of claim of lien filed in the case sub judice that the plaintiff is attempting to enforce a lien pursuant to N.C. General Statute Chap. 44A, Art. 2, Part 2. The lien notice states that plaintiff is a first tier subcontractor and follows the form prescribed by G.S. 44A-19 for filing a lien as a subcontractor. The complaint alleges a claim for a lien as a prime contractor under G.S. 44A, Art. 2, Part 1. An order was then consented to by plaintiff's attorney which recited that plaintiff was a subcontractor and Owens was the prime contractor who would be responsible for the labor and materials supplied by the subcontractor. This is a judicial finding binding on the parties. We hold that the plaintiff cannot establish a lien as a prime contractor when its own notice of claim of lien and the judicial findings to which it consented establish it as a subcontractor. The claim for a lien was properly dismissed.
In addition to the lien claim, the plaintiff, in its complaint, asked for a money judgment. In answer to interrogatories, the plaintiff stated it had made a contract with defendant Forbes to furnish labor and materials. In her affidavit, defendant Forbes denied she made a contract with plaintiff. We hold this shows a genuine issue which should have been submitted to the jury.
On the record before us, we hold that plaintiff is entitled to try its claim for a money judgment against the defendant Forbes, but it is not entitled to enforce its lien as a subcontractor.
We note that plaintiff made no assignment of error to the order striking its amended complaint. The exception to this order is deemed abandoned. Rule 10(c), N.C.Rules App.Proc.
Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Outer Banks Contractors, Inc. v. Forbes
...& Shearin, Elizabeth City, for defendant Forbes. Petition by defendant (Forbes) for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31, 47 N.C.App. 371, 267 S.E.2d 63. ...