Owen v. O'Reilly

Decision Date31 March 1855
Citation20 Mo. 603
PartiesOWEN, Appellant, v. O'REILLY, Respondent.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

1. Where a plaintiff, in a suit for wages, proves services, but fails to prove their value, an instruction that he cannot recover is erroneous, as he is entitled to a nominal sum at least.

2. Where a plaintiff, in a suit for wages, closes his case having proved services, but not their value, but immediately afterwards offers to remedy the oversight, a court, in the exercise of its discretion, should permit him to do it.

Appeal from St. Louis Law Commissioner's Court.

Action for wages, begun before a justice. At the trial before a jury, upon appeal, the plaintiff introduced evidence tending to prove the services for which he claimed to recover, and closed his case, without having proved the worth of the services, and thereupon the court instructed the jury that he could not recover. He then offered to remedy the omission by the testimony of witnesses present in court, but this the court refused to permit, whereupon he submitted to a non-suit, with leave, and after an unsuccessful attempt to set the same aside, appealed to this court.

R. S. MacDonald, for appellant.

Blenner hassett & Shreve, for respondent.

RYLAND, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

The court below should have permitted the plaintiff to introduce his testimony in relation to the value of the services he had rendered the defendant. The instruction that the plaintiff cannot recover in this case, upon the proof made, was erroneous. He was entitled to recover nominal damages at least. This instruction, then, should have been refused.

It was not a proper exercise of judicial discretion to refuse the plaintiff in this case his motion for leave to introduce this testimony. It was clearly an omission--a mere oversight--and the court ought at once to have suffered him to correct it. (Brown v. Burrus, 8 Mo. 30.) See also, Rucker v. Eddings. (7 Mo. 118.)

There could have been no necessity to have forced the plaintiff to suffer a non-suit, when the inadvertence committed by him was so easily remedied.

The court should exercise their discretion soundly for the advancement of right, and lend always an unwilling ear to mere technical objections, either in pleading or practice.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded;

the other judges concurring.

To continue reading

Request your trial
38 cases
  • Railway Co. v. Fire Association
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 28 Noviembre 1891
    ...to the laws. Meacham v. Moore, 59 Miss. 561; Smith v. State Ins. Co., 58 Iowa 487, 12 N.W. 542; Meyer v. Cullen, 54 N.Y. 392; Owen v. O'Reilly, 20 Mo. 603; 1 on Trials, sec. 348. Reversed and remanded for a new trial. --------- Notes: [*] See St. Louis, etc., Railway v. Commercial Ins. Co.,......
  • Maloy v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacifio Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 31 Octubre 1884
    ...by plaintiff, after the close of her case. Rucker v. Eddings, 7 Mo. 115; Brown v. Burns, 8 Mo. 26; Crow v. Marshall, 15 Mo. 499; Owen v. Reilly, 20 Mo. 603; State v. Porter, 26 Mo. 603; Johnston v. Mason, 27 Mo. 511; Dozier v. Jerman, 30 Mo. 220; Seibert v. Allen, 61 Mo. 482; Tiernay v. Spi......
  • City of Linneus v. Locke
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • 11 Abril 1887
    ... ... front of the lot described in the certified tax bill read in ... evidence?" Rucker v. Eddings, 7 Mo. 15; ... Brown v. Burrus, 8 Mo. 26; Owen v. Riley, ... 20 Mo. 603; State v. Porter, 26 Mo. 201; ... Johnston v. Mason, 27 Mo. 511; Dozier v ... Jerman, 30 Mo. 216; Seibert v. Allen, 61 ... ...
  • Hurt v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 20 Febrero 1888
    ... ... Railroad, 86 ... Mo. 432; Winkler v. Railroad, 21 Mo.App. 109; ... Tate v. Railroad, 64 Mo. 153; 9 Mo. 10; Brown v ... Emerson, 18 Mo. 103; Owen v. O'Reiley, 20 ... Mo. 603. (6) The second instruction for the plaintiff ... correctly declared the law. Kelley v. Railroad, 70 ... Mo. 609; ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT