Oxley v. Oxley

Decision Date18 January 1978
Docket NumberNo. 59664,59664
Citation262 N.W.2d 144
PartiesIn the Matter of the Estate of Ruth Marion OXLEY, Deceased, Farmers State Bank, Marion, Iowa, Executor of the Estate, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George A. OXLEY, Kathleen Eacutt, Ruth E. Oxley, Defendants-Appellees, and Covenant Presbyterian Church of Long Beach Unified School District, Defendant, and John Wayne Oxley, Clela O. Blankmeyer, Defendants-Appellants.
CourtIowa Supreme Court

Patrick M. Roby and W. R. Shuttleworth, of Shuttleworth & Ingersoll, Cedar Rapids, and James H. Counts and Stephen J. Briggs, of Morton, Reed & Counts, St. Joseph, Mo., for defendants-appellants John Wayne Oxley and Clela O. Blankmeyer.

Winfield A. White of White, Stone & Horan, Marion, for plaintiff-appellee.

David A. Elderkin of Wadsworth, Elderkin, Pirnie & Von Lackum, Cedar Rapids, for defendants-appellees.

Heard before MOORE, C. J., and MASON, RAWLINGS, REYNOLDSON and HARRIS, JJ.

MASON, Justice.

Defendants, John Wayne Oxley and Clela O. Blankmeyer, appeal from an adverse decree of the trial court in an action brought by the executor of the estate of Ruth M. Oxley seeking construction of the last will and testament of the decedent. The appeal presents the question whether four certificates of deposit listed in Schedule C of the probate inventory of the decedent's estate should be included in the bequest of "stocks, bonds and/or securities" in paragraph six of decedent's last will and testament or whether they should be a part of the rest, residue and remainder of the estate which would be distributed according to paragraph seven of the will and paragraph five-A of the first codicil.

July 12, 1975, Ruth Marion Oxley, then a resident of Marion, Iowa, died testate. Her will dated April 21, 1964, her first codicil dated September 28, 1965, and her second codicil dated August 15, 1967, each of which was executed while she was a resident of Long Beach, California, have all been admitted to probate in the Linn District Court. When her executor, Farmers State Bank, Marion, Iowa, reached the point at which distribution under the will could commence, a dispute arose concerning proper distribution.

Miss Oxley had never married and, at the time of her death, her only surviving heirs at law were two nephews, John Wayne Oxley and George A. Oxley, and two nieces, Clela O. Blankmeyer and Kathleen Eacutt. The decedent was also survived by her sister-in-law, Ruth E. Oxley.

As indicated, the executor filed a petition in equity in the Linn District Court seeking construction of the sixth paragraph of the will. Defendants, George A. Oxley, Kathleen Eacutt, and Ruth E. Oxley, answered and filed a motion for summary judgment. Defendants, John Wayne Oxley and Clela O. Blankmeyer, also answered and filed a motion for summary judgment.

At the hearing on the motions for summary judgment the parties agreed the court should treat the motions and the support thereto as arguments relating to the petition for construction. The parties later filed briefs in support of the arguments raised in their motions. After consideration of these arguments, the trial court ruled in favor of the position of the executor and of defendants, George A. Oxley, Kathleen Eacutt and Ruth E. Oxley.

The provisions of the will relevant hereto are as follows:

"SIXTH

"I hereby give, devise and bequeath all of my stocks, bonds and/or securities owned by me at the time of my demise, wheresoever situated and howsoever held unto the following named persons, or to the survivor of them, in equal shares, share and share alike:

"1. To my nephew, GEORGE A. OXLEY, of Cheyenne, Wyoming;

"2. To my nephew, JOHN WAYNE OXLEY, of St. Joseph, Missouri;

"3. To my niece, CLELA BLANKMEYER, of Waukegan, Illinois;

"4. To my niece, KATHLEEN EACUTT, of Lakewood, California.

"SEVENTH

"I give, devise and bequeath all of the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, both real and personal, howsoever held and wheresoever situated unto my beloved brother and sister-in-law, GEORGE C. OXLEY and RUTH E. OXLEY, in equal shares or to the survivor among them.

"EIGHTH

"In the event that both my beloved brother and sister-in-law, GEORGE C. OXLEY and RUTH E. OXLEY, shall have predeceased me, I hereby give, devise and bequeath to my beloved niece, KATHLEEN EACUTT or her legal heirs, all of the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, both real and personal, however held and wherever situated." (Emphasis supplied).

In a first codicil to her will, testatrix, by insertion of a new paragraph entitled fifth-A, made a bequest of $500.00 to the Covenant Presbyterian Church of Long Beach, California, and a bequest of $1,000.00 to the Long Beach Unified School District, Long Beach, California, and changed the executor of her will. By a second codicil she designated her brother George C. Oxley as her executor. Her brother predeceased her and the Marion State Bank was named executor. No issues are raised as to these codicils.

At her death testatrix left a total gross estate of $97,827.94. The total estate assets may be summarized as follows:

                1. Checking account in Farmers
                    State Bank ........................ $   800.37
                2.  Savings account in Farmers
                    State Bank ........................ $ 3,887.38
                3.  Benefits payable from California
                    Teachers Retirement System ........ $ 2,000.00
                4.  Life Insurance ..................... $10,632.37
                5.  Three savings certificates
                    of deposit with Marion
                    State Bank ........................ $33,877.82
                6.  One savings certificate with
                    Security Savings and Loan
                    Asssociation, Marion, Iowa
                    (formerly Linn County Savings
                    and Loan Association, Marion
                    Iowa) ............................. $24,295.12
                7.  Shares of stock in various
                    corporations ...................... $22,334.88
                

All parties hereto agree the shares of stock valued at $22,334.88 (Item 7) pass to the nephews and nieces through the sixth paragraph of the will. At issue here is the distribution of the four savings certificates of deposit (Items 5 and 6) totaling $58,172.94.

Defendants, John Wayne Oxley and Clela O. Blankmeyer, contend the four certificates of deposit pass through the sixth paragraph, of the will because of their interpretation of the phrase, "stocks, bonds and/or securities." The executor and defendants, George A. Oxley, Kathleen Eacutt and Ruth E. Oxley, interpret the phrase differently and consequently contend the certificates pass through the seventh paragraph of the will.

The trial court, after consideration of the motions for summary judgment, the support for these motions and the briefs of the parties, ruled in part as follows:

" * * *

"Three of the certificates of deposit referred to are entitled 'Savings Certificate of Deposit' in the Farmers State Bank, Marion, Iowa, and state that the testatrix 'has deposited in this bank * * * the sum of' and then stated the amount of the deposit. There is a further provision that the deposit is 'not subject to check' and not negotiable. Those certificates further provide for interest, renewal, withdrawal penalties, etc. The other certificate is designated a savings certificate * * *. This certificate also provides for interest, renewal, withdrawal penalties, etc.

"While it is not particularly significant of anything, the certificates of deposit, as well as all of the stocks and bonds listed in the inventory in this estate, were purchased long after the execution of the will and the codicil, and the certificates of deposit were in fact issued to the conservator of the testatrix's property.

" * * *

"The Court finds that when the testatrix said in Paragraph Sixth that she wanted two named nephews and two named nieces to have in equal shares 'all my stocks, bonds and/or securities owned by me at the time of my demise,' she meant the shares of stock listed in Schedule B of the inventory, the kind of stocks and bonds and securities that one buys in the open market, not money on deposit in banks and savings and loan associations. The Court finds that the testatrix by using the language she employed in Paragraph Sixth of her will intended to restrict the meaning of 'securities' to those of the same nature as stocks and bonds under the general legal principle that where words of a general nature follow or are used in connection with the designation in a will of particular objects or classes of persons or things, the meaning of the general words will be restricted to the particular designation, under the rule of 'ejusdem generis.'

"The Court finds that the testatrix intended to bequeath the four certificates of deposit referred to according to the provisions of Paragraph Fifth-A of the codicil and Paragraph Seventh of her Last Will and Testament."

The issues as framed by the parties are as follows:

1. Is the phrase, "stocks, bonds and/or securities," ambiguous so that rules of construction of wills must be used to determine the intent of the testatrix?

2. Does the term "securities" include savings certificates of deposit?

3. Does application of the rule of ejusdem generis to the phrase "stocks, bonds and/or securities" result in a finding the term "securities" is limited in meaning to such securities as would be bought in the open market?

I. In this equitable action our review is de novo. Section 633.33, The Code; Larson v. Anderson, 167 N.W.2d 640, 642 (Iowa 1969); Houts v. Jameson, 201 N.W.2d 466, 468 (Iowa 1972). "While weight will be given to findings of trial court this court will not abdicate its function as triers de novo on appeal. * * * (citing authority)." In re Marriage of Williams, 199 N.W.2d 339, 346 (Iowa 1972).

In a case of this type our review is guided by certain well-established legal principles. This court recently repeated the following principles in Baldrige v. Greiner, 255 N.W.2d 114, 115 (Iowa 1977):

"The legal principles upon which this case must be decided are well settled. They have been frequently announced by us, most recently in In Matter of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • State v. Brown
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • November 23, 1983
    ...trial court does not seek to uphold the ruling on the ground suggested. (Citations omitted.) (Emphasis added.) See also Oxley v. Oxley, 262 N.W.2d 144, 151 (Iowa 1978). It is only logical to reason that if we would uphold a ruling of a trial court for a reason other than the one relied on b......
  • Merrill v. Wimmer
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • September 13, 1983
    ...(In re Rogers' Estate (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1965) 180 So.2d 167), Iowa (In re Herring's Estate (Iowa 1978) 265 N.W.2d 740; Oxley v. Oxley (Iowa 1978) 262 N.W.2d 144), Kansas (In re Miller's Estate, (1960) 186 Kan. 87, 348 P.2d 1033), Massachusetts (Old Colony Trust Co. v. New England Merchants N......
  • Estate of Boldt, Matter of, 83-106
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • December 21, 1983
    ...involves the construction of a will with reference to the disposition of joint tenancy property. Our review is de novo. Oxley v. Oxley, 262 N.W.2d 144, 147 (Iowa 1978). The following appears from the documents and testimony in evidence. Mary K. Boldt, testatrix, owned accounts in financial ......
  • Estate of Crist, Matter of
    • United States
    • Iowa Court of Appeals
    • November 29, 1988
    ...and chattels was ambiguous. We find the will to be unambiguous. We reverse the district court. Our review is de novo. Oxley v. Oxley, 262 N.W.2d 144, 147 (Iowa 1978). In a de novo review we make findings of fact anew; however, when considering the credibility of witnesses, we give weight to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT