Oyekoya v. State

Decision Date17 November 1989
Docket Number8 Div. 383
Citation558 So.2d 990
PartiesWale OYEKOYA v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Court of Criminal Appeals

Steven A. Backer, Huntsville, for appellant.

Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and Venessa Campbell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

BOWEN, Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for post-conviction relief. Wale Oyekoya challenges his two 1987 guilty plea convictions for theft on the grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. We find that the petition was properly denied.

The petitioner has failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence the facts necessary to entitle him to relief. Rule 20.3, A.R.Cr.P.Temp. The petitioner claims that his counsel was ineffective because counsel failed to inform him of the possibility of deportation as a result of his guilty plea. At the evidentiary hearing held on the petition, the assistant district attorney stated that the prosecutor who represented the State at the entry of the petitioner's guilty pleas would testify, if available, that the petitioner's defense counsel, Henry Mims, was deceased and that the petitioner and Mims "had extensive discussions as to the Immigration and Naturalization Service rules, regulations, and ramifications of [the petitioner's] entering a plea as well as the pending charge that he had in Wisconsin. And that the discussion here in this case was that a recommendation would be made, and that the recommendation was made and it included a restitution aspect as to it, that the recommendation would be made if the restitution was made." Here, the petitioner did not submit "clear, full and satisfactory proof" of the allegations of his petition. Summers v. State, 366 So.2d 336, 343 (Ala.Cr.App.1978), cert. denied, Ex parte Summers, 366 So.2d 346 (Ala.1979).

Furthermore, "counsel's failure to advise the defendant of the collateral consequences of a guilty plea, such as deportation, cannot rise to the level of constitutionally ineffective assistance." United States v. Campbell, 778 F.2d 764, 768 (11th Cir.1985). See also United States v. Romero-Vilca, 850 F.2d 177, 179 (3rd Cir.1988) ("[W]e hold that potential deportation is a collateral consequence of a guilty plea. Accordingly, we find no error in the sentencing court's failure to inform Romero-Vilca in the Rule 11 Colloquy of his possible deportation."); Annot., 10 A.L.R.4th 8 (1981).

Apparently, on the initial...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Padilla v. Ky., No. 08-651
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • March 31, 2010
    ... ... Also, informed consideration of possible deportation can benefit both the State ... and noncitizen defendants, who may be able to reach agreements that better ... satisfy the interests of both parties. This decision will not ... Ashcroft , 358 F.3d ... 1251 (CA10 2004); United States v. Campbell , 778 ... F.2d 764 (CA11 1985); Oyekoya v. State , 558 So. 2d ... 990 (Ala. Ct. Crim. App. 1989); State v. Rosas , ... 183 Ariz. 421, 904 P.2d 1245 (App. 1995); State v ... ...
  • Padilla v. Kentuchy, 08–651.
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • March 31, 2010
    ...2008); Broomes v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 1251 (C.A.10 2004); United States v. Campbell, 778 F.2d 764 (C.A.11 1985); Oyekoya v. State, 558 So.2d 990 (Ala.Ct.Crim.App.1989); State v. Rosas, 183 Ariz. 421, 904 P.2d 1245 (App.1995); State v. Montalban, 2000–2739 (La.2/26/02), 810 So.2d 1106; Common......
  • State v. Aquino, 24431.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • June 7, 2005
    ...509 F.2d 703, 704 (2d Cir.1975); Government of Virgin Islands v. Pamphile, 604 F.Supp. 753, 756-57 (D.Vi.1985); Oyekoya v. State, 558 So.2d 990, 990-91 (Ala.Crim.App.1989); Tafoya v. State, 500 P.2d 247, 252 (Alaska 1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 945, 93 S.Ct. 1389, 35 L.Ed.2d 611 (1973); St......
  • Padilla v. Kentucky
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • October 13, 2009
    ...2008); Broomes v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 1251 (C.A.10 2004); United States v. Campbell, 778 F.2d 764 (C.A.11 1985); Oyekoya v. State, 558 So.2d 990 (Ala.Ct.Crim.App.1989); State v. Rosas, 183 Ariz. 421, 904 P.2d 1245 (App. 1995); State v. Montalban, 2000-2739 (La.2/26/02), 810 So.2d 1106; Commo......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT