Pacific Southwest Trust & Sav. Bank v. Mayer
Decision Date | 18 March 1926 |
Docket Number | 19700. |
Citation | 244 P. 248,138 Wash. 85 |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Parties | PACIFIC SOUTHWEST TRUST & SAVINGS BANK v. MAYER et al. |
Department 1.
Appeal from Superior Court, King County; Ralston, Judge.
Action by the Pacific Southwest Trust & Savings Bank against J. P Mayer and others. From a judgment against named defendant, he appeals. Reversed and remanded, with instructions.
Fred H Peterson and Stuart D. Barker, both of Seattle, for appellant.
This is an action brought to recover upon a promissory note. There was a trial of the action before the court sitting without a jury, resulting in a judgment against the defendant J. P Mayer. From this judgment Mayer appeals.
The facts appear in the findings of the trial court; the evidence not being in the record. The findings are as follows:
From the findings, the court made the following conclusion of law:
The Exhibit A, referred to in the findings, is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dove v. Cowlitz Valley Bank
... ... v. Jose, 10 Wash. 185, 38 P. 1026; Pacific Southwest ... Trust & Savings Bank v. Mayer, 138 ... ...
-
United States v. Elfer
...D.C.Mass.1942, 2 F.R.D. 479, 482; 2 Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 512, p. 62; Pacific Southwest Trust & Savings Bank v. Mayer, 1926, 138 Wash. 85, 244 P. 248.11 Government argues that the District Court should have called in the absent defendant, not dismiss the cause......
-
Turner v. Wexler
...v. Jacobson, 6 Wash.App. 363, 367, 492 P.2d 1043 (1972); 3A. Corbin, Contracts § 94 at 572 (1960).11 See Pacific S.W. Trust & Sav. Bank v. Mayer, 138 Wash. 85, 89, 244 P. 248 (1926); Cf. 2 S. Williston, Law of Contracts § 316, at 541 (1959); Restatement of Contracts § 11 comment A at 130 (1......
- McLaughlin v. Orient Ins. Co.