Paden v. Briscoe
Decision Date | 23 June 1891 |
Citation | 17 S.W. 42 |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Parties | PADEN v. BRISCOE <I>et al.</I><SMALL><SUP>1</SUP></SMALL> |
Action on a policy of insurance on the life of John F. Briscoe by W. D. Paden, administrator of Louella Briscoe, against the Supreme Lodge Knights and Ladies of Honor, and Leonard Isaacs, administrator of John F. Briscoe, husband of plaintiff's intestate. Mary Briscoe and Kate Briscoe, the mother and sister of John F. Briscoe, intervened, claiming the fund paid into court by the defendant lodge. Trial to the court, judgment for intervenors, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
W. T. Hefley and D. D. Wallace, for appellant. Ford & Ford, for appellee.
This suit was instituted by appellant, as administrator of the estate of Louella Briscoe, deceased, against the Supreme Lodge Knights and Ladies of Honor, a mutual benefit life insurance company, and Leonard Isaacs, administrator of the estate of John F. Briscoe, deceased, upon two relief fund certificates or policies issued and delivered to John F. Briscoe, May 1, 1884. Appellant, among other things, alleges that his intestate, Louella Briscoe, was the wife of John F. Briscoe, and that John F. Briscoe died on June 4, 1888, and that his intestate was named as beneficiary in the certificates or policies, and that Leonard Isaacs was asserting some pretended claim to said policies. The defendant Supreme Lodge Knights and Ladies of Honor answered, and admitted its liability in the policies sued on, and brought the money into court subject to the result of the litigation between the parties. On November 19, 1888, the appellees intervened in the case, claiming the policies, and funds arising therefrom, as the mother and sister of John F. Briscoe, being his sole heirs dependent upon him, and that the beneficiary named in said policies, Louella Briscoe, died before her husband, or at the same time he died, and that by virtue of the laws of the association they were entitled to the proceeds of the policies. Appellant filed a general denial to the plea of intervention. The case was tried before the court without a jury, and judgment was rendered in favor of intervenors against all the other parties to the suit for the $2,000, amount of said certificates or policies.
The case is here upon the conclusions of law and facts found by the court, substantially as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Watkins v. Home Life & Accident Insurance Company
...the insured. 92 Am. St. Rep. 641; 69 S.W. 370; 69 S.W. 671; 24 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law, 1027; 92 Ill. 227; 135 Mass. 468; 81 Texas 563; 17 S.W. 42; 198 Ill. 590; 70 108; 135 Mass. 468; 65 S.W. 131; 78 Am. St. Rep. 842; 81 Tex. 678; 10 L. R. A. 550; 29 Wash. Law Rep. 171. 3. The facts indicate t......
-
St. John v. Andrews Inst. for Girls
...time is equivalent to dying before. Yound Women's Christian Home v. French, 187 U. S. 401, 23 Sup. Ct. 184, 47 L. Ed. 233;Paden v. Briscoe, 81 Tex. 563, 17 S. W. 42;Fuller v. Linzee, 135 Mass. 468;Balder v. Middeke, 92 Ill. App. 227;Southwell v. Gray, 35 Misc. Rep. (N. Y.) 740, 72 N. Y. Sup......
-
Colovo's Adm'r v. Gouvas
...92 Am.St.Rep. 284; Fuller v. Linzee, 135 Mass. 468; Dunn v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, 141 A.D. 478, 126 N.Y.S. 229; Paden v. Briscoe, 81 Tex. 563, 17 S.W. 42. A case is Fleming v. Grimes, 142 Miss. 522, 107 So. 420, 422, 45 A.L.R. 618. Here a husband, wife, and child lost their lives ......
-
Carpenter v. Severin
...to provide for some dependent, and the courts endeavor to read the contract so as to respect the intention of the insured. Paden v. Briscoe, 81 Tex. 563, 17 S. W. 42;Southwell v. Gray, 35 Misc. Rep. 740, 72 N. Y. S. 342. Some courts, in determining the burden of proof, place emphasis on the......