Padilla v. Kentuchy, No. 08–651.
Court | United States Supreme Court |
Citation | 173 L.Ed.2d 582,555 U.S. 1169,129 S.Ct. 1317 (Mem) |
Docket Number | No. 08–651. |
Parties | Jose PADILLA, petitioner, v. KENTUCKY. |
Decision Date | 23 February 2009 |
555 U.S. 1169
129 S.Ct. 1317 (Mem)
173 L.Ed.2d 582
Jose PADILLA, petitioner
v.
KENTUCKY.
No. 08–651.
Supreme Court of the United States
Feb. 23, 2009.
Opinion
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kentucky granted.
To continue reading
Request your trial6 practice notes
-
Verduzco v. State, CC CV110467
...the State of Kentucky for a response on December 18, 2008, and it granted Padilla's petition on February 23, 2009. Padilla v. Kentucky, 555 U.S. 1169, 129 S.Ct. 1317, 173 L.Ed.2d 582 (2009).3 In March 2010, the Court 357 Or. 559reversed the judgment of the Kentucky Supreme Court and remande......
-
State v. DENISYUK
...by the Supreme Court. Padilla v. Kentucky was argued on October 13, 2009. Certiorari had been granted on February 23, 2009, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 1317, 173 L.Ed.2d 582, with one of the questions before the Court, as stated in the petitioner's brief, being: "In providing the effective assi......
-
Padilla v. Kentuchy, No. 08–651.
...petitioner about the possibility of removal, nor counsel's incorrect advice, could provide a basis for relief.We granted certiorari, 555 U.S. 1169, 129 S.Ct. 1317, 173 L.Ed.2d 582 (2009), to decide whether, as a matter of federal law, Padilla's counsel had an obligation to advise him that t......
-
State v. Denisyuk, No. 1819, September Term, 2008 (Md. App. 3/29/2010), No. 1819, September Term, 2008.
...the Supreme Court. Padilla v. Kentucky was argued on October 13, 2009. Certiorari had been granted on February 23, 2009, ____ v. ____, 129 S. Ct. 1317, 173 L. Ed. 2d 582, with one of the questions before the Court, as stated in the petitioner's brief, being: "In providing the effective assi......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Verduzco v. State, CC CV110467
...the State of Kentucky for a response on December 18, 2008, and it granted Padilla's petition on February 23, 2009. Padilla v. Kentucky, 555 U.S. 1169, 129 S.Ct. 1317, 173 L.Ed.2d 582 (2009).3 In March 2010, the Court 357 Or. 559reversed the judgment of the Kentucky Supreme Court and remande......
-
State v. DENISYUK
...by the Supreme Court. Padilla v. Kentucky was argued on October 13, 2009. Certiorari had been granted on February 23, 2009, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 1317, 173 L.Ed.2d 582, with one of the questions before the Court, as stated in the petitioner's brief, being: "In providing the effective assi......
-
Padilla v. Kentuchy, No. 08–651.
...petitioner about the possibility of removal, nor counsel's incorrect advice, could provide a basis for relief.We granted certiorari, 555 U.S. 1169, 129 S.Ct. 1317, 173 L.Ed.2d 582 (2009), to decide whether, as a matter of federal law, Padilla's counsel had an obligation to advise him that t......
-
State v. Denisyuk, No. 1819, September Term, 2008 (Md. App. 3/29/2010), No. 1819, September Term, 2008.
...the Supreme Court. Padilla v. Kentucky was argued on October 13, 2009. Certiorari had been granted on February 23, 2009, ____ v. ____, 129 S. Ct. 1317, 173 L. Ed. 2d 582, with one of the questions before the Court, as stated in the petitioner's brief, being: "In providing the effective assi......
Request a trial to view additional results