Page v. Page, 78-1938

Decision Date29 May 1979
Docket NumberNo. 78-1938,78-1938
PartiesSandra Schiller PAGE, Appellant, v. Michel Douglas PAGE, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Friedman, Britton, Cohen, Kaufman, Zinkow, Benson & Schantz and John L. Britton, Miami, for appellant.

Abe Koss, Graham C. Miller, Miami, for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and SCHWARTZ, JJ.

HAVERFIELD, Chief Judge.

Sandra Schiller Page appeals a final dissolution of marriage judgment denying her request for alimony and directing that her husband, the respondent, Michel Douglas Page, pay $40 per week as and for support of their minor son.

The basic issue to be resolved is whether the trial judge erred in his determination of the amount of child support by failing to consider a trust established for Michel Page.

The parties were married three years during which time Michel Page was and is employed by a business owned by his family and earns $100 per week. Although Michel would have difficulty in qualifying as a spendthrift based on his salary; nevertheless, he is the beneficiary of a spendthrift trust which was established by his father and produces an annual income of approximately $17,000. With respect to the distribution of income, the trust contains the following:

"Paragraph 1 : The Trustee shall hold the entire Trust Estate which it has received under this Instrument together with all additions, accretions, gains, profits, income or other enhancements thereof for the benefit of MICHEL D. PAGE or his issue, in accordance with the following provisions:

"A. Prior to the Termination Event (as defined in Paragraph 2 below) the Trustee may in the exercise of its sole discretion, either:

"(1) Accumulate all or any portion of the net income of the Trust, or

"(2) Distribute to or for the benefit of the Beneficiary, all or any portion of the net income of the Trust as such net income shall be from time to time determined in accordance with the provisions of this Instrument. Subject to the provisions of Article III (relating to Spendthrift Provisions), distributions of income may be made to or for the benefit of the Beneficiary for any lawful purpose, including, but not limited to: the purchase of luxury items for the Beneficiary; the payment of rent or mortgage payments for the Beneficiary's living quarters; the payment of any insurance premiums for the Beneficiary, including but not limited to those for the Beneficiary's health, major medical, and life insurance; the payment of any type of educational expenses for the Beneficiary; the payment of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Oxley v. Oxley
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 19, 1997
    ...and investment. Clearly, the father's "income," for the purpose of determining child support, includes trust income. Page v. Page, 371 So.2d 543 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Trust income is recognized in section 61.046(4), Florida Statutes, which defines income (4) "Income" means any form of payment......
  • Gilbert v. Gilbert, s. 83-501
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 27, 1984
    ...Miami's retirement fund even though the enacting ordinance specifically exempted the pension funds from garnishment. In Page v. Page, 371 So.2d 543 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), the court indirectly approved the invasion of a spendthrift trust by directing the trial judge to take into consideration t......
  • Liebler v. Liebler
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 4, 1982
    ...achievers. The prime criteria by which to measure child support are the child's needs and the parents' ability to pay. Page v. Page, 371 So.2d 543, 544 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Davis v.Davis, 371 So.2d 591, 593 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). A child's educational need is a factor to which the trial judge s......
  • Diaz v. Diaz
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 3, 1982
    ...support when no evidence was presented as to the needs of the child or the father's ability to support the child. See Page v. Page, 371 So.2d 543 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). We commend the trial judge upon the exercise of judicial conscience. The granting of a judgment dissolving a marriage is not ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT