Pait v. Ford Motor Co.

Decision Date15 January 1987
Docket NumberNo. 86-236,86-236
Citation12 Fla. L. Weekly 277,500 So.2d 743
Parties12 Fla. L. Weekly 277, Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 11,245 Sharon PAIT, Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Stewart, Tilghman, Fox & Bianchi, James C. Blecke and Susan S. Lerner, Miami, for appellant.

Ronald E. Cabaniss and Sharon Lee Stedman, of Rumberger, Kirk, Caldwell, Cabaniss & Burke, Orlando and John M. Thomas, Dearborn, Mich., for appellee.

ORFINGER, Judge.

The plaintiff appeals from a final judgment dismissing this wrongful death action on the basis of section 95.031(2), Florida Statutes (1985), the statute of repose, which provides that product liability actions must be commenced within 12 years after the date of delivery of the completed product to its original purchaser. Plaintiff's decedent was killed on July 22, 1984 while operating a tractor manufactured and delivered more than 12 years earlier by defendant Ford Motor Company.

We affirm on the authority of Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc., 476 So.2d 657 (Fla.1985) which held the statute in question to be constitutional, and not a denial of equal protection or of access to courts. 1 Pullum expressly receded from Battilla v. Allis Chalmers Manufacturing Company, 392 So.2d 874 (Fla.1980) which had earlier held the statute in question to be an unconstitutional deprivation of plaintiff's access to courts. If a decision holding a statute to be unconstitutional is subsequently overruled, the statute will be valid from the date it became effective. Christopher v. Mungen, 61 Fla. 513, 534, 55 So. 273, 280 (1911); State ex rel. Gillespie v. Bay County, 112 Fla. 687, 151 So. 10 (1933). It does not appear that any property or contract rights were acquired by the plaintiff here such as would make an exception to this rule applicable. Cf. Florida Forest and Park Service v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So.2d 251 (1944).

Neither do we perceive a legislative intent that the 1986 amendment to section 95.031(2), abolishing the 12 year statute of repose in products liability cases, operate retroactively. However, because the questions involved here are recurring and appear to be of great public importance, we certify the following to the Supreme Court of Florida.

I

WHETHER THE LEGISLATIVE AMENDMENT OF SECTION 95.031(2), FLORIDA STATUTES (1985), ABOLISHING THE STATUTE OF REPOSE IN PRODUCT LIABILITY ACTIONS, SHOULD BE CONSTRUED TO OPERATE RETROSPECTIVELY TO A CAUSE OF ACTION WHICH ACCRUED BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE AMENDMENT?

II

IF NOT, WHETHER THE DECISION OF PULLUM V. CINCINNATI, INC., 476 So.2d 657 (FLA.1985) WHICH OVERRULED BATTILLA...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • Hampton v. A. Duda & Sons, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 3, 1987
    ...ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION COBB, Judge. Initially, we issued a per curiam affirmance in this case, citing to Pait v. Ford Motor Co., 500 So.2d 743 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). On Motion for Clarification filed by the appellant, Albert Hampton, and pursuant to a sua sponte reconsideration of this c......
  • Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. v. Phlieger
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • May 28, 1987
    ...entirely based on products liability, the statute of repose dictated that it should be dismissed. Ironically, in Pait v. Ford Motor Co., 500 So.2d 743 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), another panel of the Fifth District Court of Appeal has recently held that section 95.031(2) precluded the filing of a ......
  • Smith v. Sturm, Ruger, Smith & Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 17, 1987
    ...Corp., 503 So.2d 362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Small v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, 502 So.2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Pait v. Ford Motor Co., 500 So.2d 743 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Cassidy v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 495 So.2d 801 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); and American Liberty Insurance Co. v. West ......
  • Melendez v. Dreis and Krump Mfg. Co.
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • October 15, 1987
    ...Corp., 503 So.2d 362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Small v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, 502 So.2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Pait v. Ford Motor Co., 500 So.2d 743 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). See Walker & LaBerge, Inc. v. Halligan, 344 So.2d 239 (Fla.1977) (immunity from suit not retroactively withdrawn by su......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT