Palladay v. Palladay, 82-635

Decision Date08 December 1982
Docket NumberNo. 82-635,82-635
Citation422 So.2d 1108
PartiesAnn C. PALLADAY, Appellant, v. Gary J. PALLADAY, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Edgar Dunn and Horace Smith, Jr., of Dunn, Smith & Withers, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Sylvan A. Wells of Sylvan A. Wells, P.A., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

COWART, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing an action to domesticate, enforce and modify a foreign divorce judgment containing provisions for alimony and child support.

The trial court dismissed the action because the foreign decree was subject to modification in the foreign state and because alleged arrearages had not been reduced to judgment in the foreign state. The complaint alleged arrearages of alimony and child support and that under the laws of the foreign state such arrearages were vested and not subject to modification. Not only is Florida bound, under the federal full faith and credit clause, to recognize and enforce arrearages that have been reduced to judgment in a sister state but, under principles of comity, arrearages under a foreign judgment that have not been reduced to judgment there may be enforced here where, as in this case, they are not subject to modification by the sister state after they have accrued. Furthermore, a foreign support judgment may be first domesticated here and then, as a Florida decree, modified here. See Lopez v. Avery, 66 So.2d 689 (Fla.1953); Sackler v. Sackler, 47 So.2d 292 (Fla.1950); Berger v. Hollander, 391 So.2d 716 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Fugassi v. Fugassi, 332 So.2d 695 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Courtney v. Warner, 290 So.2d 101 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).

REVERSED AND REMANDED for further proceedings.

ORFINGER, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Helmick v. Helmick
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 8 Septiembre 1983
    ...e.g., Barber v. Barber, 323 U.S. 77, 65 S.Ct. 137, 89 L.Ed. 82 (1944); Sackler v. Sackler, 47 So.2d 292 (Fla.1950); Palladay v. Palladay, 422 So.2d 1108 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Courtney v. Warner, 290 So.2d 101 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).12 See, e.g., Sackler; McDuffie v. McDuffie, 155 Fla. 63, 19 So......
  • Watson v. Blakely
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of New Mexico
    • 29 Diciembre 1987
    ...85 N.M. 260, 511 P.2d 746 (1973); Altman v. Altman; see also Worthley v. Worthley, 44 Cal.2d 465, 283 P.2d 19 (1955); Palladay v. Palladay, 422 So.2d 1108 (Fla.App.1982); Blue v. Blue, 243 Ga. 22, 252 S.E.2d 452 (1979). Similarly, judgments rendered in a foreign nation and recognized under ......
  • Pettigrew v. Pettigrew, 87-228
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 26 Enero 1988
    ...to deny the establishment of the Arizona order for the purposes both of the assessment of vested arrearages, Palladay v. Palladay, 422 So.2d 1108 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Fugassi v. Fugassi, 332 So.2d 695 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Edgar v. Edgar, 126 So.2d 585 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961), and of the establis......
  • Fabio v. Monell, 91-805
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 17 Enero 1992
    ...the date of filing of the petition to establish and modify the foreign decree as a Florida judgment. We affirm. In Palladay v. Palladay, 422 So.2d 1108 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), we reversed the trial court for dismissing an action to domesticate, enforce and modify a foreign divorce judgment con......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT