Pallone v. New York Telephone Company
Decision Date | 09 June 1972 |
Citation | 286 N.E.2d 735,335 N.Y.S.2d 300,30 N.Y.2d 865 |
Parties | , 286 N.E.2d 735 Pat PALLONE et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY, Respondent. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, 34 A.D.2d 1091, 312 N.Y.S.2d 660.
Costello, Cooney & Fearon, Syracuse (Vincent A. O'Neil, Angela S. Cooney, Syracuse, of counsel), for defendant-respondent.
An action was brought by landowner against telephone company for damages for trespass. The Onondaga Trial Term, Carl W. Peterson, J., entered a judgment for the landowners and the telephone company appealed.
The Appellate Division reversed. It held that where the poles were in plain view at the time owners acquired property they took the property with notice of the telephone company's rights. The landlowners appealed.
In the Court of Appeals, the company urged that the agreements executed by former owners created a property right in the telephone company to install and maintain its communications equipment on land which could not be terminated at will or automatically extinguished upon conveyance of land and that the landowners, prior to acquiring their respective interests, had actual or constructive notice of telephone company's occupancy. The telephone company also asserted there was no basis for award of punitive damages and that the recovery of damages accruing more than three years prior to commencement of action of trespass to real property was barred.
Order affirmed, without costs.
All concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Euro-Swiss Intern. Corp.
...445 N.Y.S.2d 336 (1981); Pallone v. New York Telephone Co., 34 A.D.2d 1091, 321 N.Y.S.2d 660 (4th Dept. 1970) aff'd 30 N.Y.2d 865, 335 N.Y.S.2d 300, 286 N.E.2d 735 (1972); Sanzone v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 47 Misc.2d 237, 262 N.Y.S.2d 138 (1965) aff'd 27 A.D.2d 646, 277 N.Y.S.2d 125 (1......
-
Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.
...the agreement that inquiry would have revealed (Pallone v. New York Tele. Co., 34 A.D.2d 1091, 312 N.Y.S.2d 672, affd. 30 N.Y.2d 865, 335 N.Y.S.2d 300, 286 N.E.2d 735; Historic Estates v. United Paper Bd. Co., 260 App.Div. 344, 21 N.Y.S.2d 819, affd. 285 N.Y. 658, 33 N.E.2d 866; see Butterw......
-
487 Elmwood, Inc. v. Hassett
...that the plaintiffs did not see them." In Pallone v. New York Tel. Co., 34 A.D.2d 1091, 312 N.Y.S.2d 660, affd. 30 N.Y.2d 865, 335 N.Y.S.2d 300, 286 N.E.2d 735, we said that where telephone poles are in plain view when property is acquired "a purchaser is placed on constructive notice of th......
-
In re Hardway Restaurant, Inc.
...336 (4th Dep't 1981); Pallone v. New York Telephone Co., 34 A.D.2d 1091, 312 N.Y.S.2d 660 (4th Dept.1970), aff'd, 30 N.Y.2d 865, 333 N.Y.S.2d 300, 286 N.E.2d 735 (1972); Sanzone v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 47 Misc.2d 237, 262 N.Y.S.2d 138 (Sup.Ct. Oneida Cty. 1965), aff'd, 27 A.D.2d 646,......
-
7.38 F. Easements
...124 N.Y. 120 (1891). [1055] . RPL § 290(3).[1056] . Pallone v. N.Y. Tel. Co., 34 A.D.2d 1091, 312 N.Y.S.2d 660 (4th Dep’t 1970), aff’d, 30 N.Y.2d 865, 335 N.Y.S.2d 300 (1972). ...