Palmer v. McCarthy
Decision Date | 10 October 1892 |
Citation | 31 P. 241,2 Colo.App. 422 |
Parties | PALMER v. McCARTHY, Sheriff. |
Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
Appeal from district court, Pueblo county; JULIUS C. GUNTER, Judge.
Action of replevin by W.W. Palmer, as assignee of D.C. Bowne against T.G. McCarthy, as sheriff, to recover the possession of a stock of goods. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
The other facts fully appear in the following statement by REED J.:
One D.C. Bowne, engaged in mercantile business in the city of Pueblo, on the 3d day of August, 1889, attempted to make an assignment for the benefit of creditors under the statute of 1885, (1 Mills' Ann.St. c. 9, § 169; Acts 1885, p. 43:) --and in pursuance of such attempt made and executed the following paper:
On the 12th day of August, Bowne filed a partial list of creditors with the approximate amount due each, at the bottom of which occurs the following: "Amount of stock on hand, about $35,000." McCarthy, appellee, was sheriff of Pueblo county. On August 3, 1889, the Central National Bank of Pueblo sued out a writ of attachment against assignor, Bowne. It was by the sheriff levied upon the goods mentioned in the complaint as the property of Bowne. On the same day F.L. Strang & Co. sued out an attachment against the same party, which was by the sheriff levied upon the same goods. On the same date the Pueblo Hardware Company sued out an attachment, which was levied upon the same goods; also, on the same date, James G. Johnson & Co. sued out an attachment, which was levied upon the same goods. On the 5th day of August the suits of the Central National Bank and Strang & Co. against Bowne were settled, and attachments released; but the goods were still held under the attachments of the other parties named. From the 5th to the 14th of the same month, the Newall Bros. Manufacturing Company, Eberhard Faber, the Japanese Fan Company, Koch, Sons & Co., and Edward Scheitlin & Co. commenced suits by attachment in the county court of Pueblo county, which were levied upon the goods which were attempted to be conveyed by the assignment. On August 7th, appellant, as assignee of Bowne, filed his complaint in the usual form, alleging that by virtue of the assignment he was entitled to the possession of the following described goods and chattels, to wit: "A certain stock of leather and millinery goods, now situate in the leather and millinery department of a certain building, known as the 'Bon Marche' building, situate on the corner of Seventh street and Santa Fe avenue, in the city of Pueblo, in said county and state, the same being part of a general stock of merchandise formerly owned and possessed by one D.C. Bowne, and being all the goods situate in the said leather and millinery department of the said Bon Marche building," and that the same were withheld from him by McCarthy. Defendant, McCarthy, answered generally and specifically, first, denying all the material allegations in the complaint; second, that the pretended deed of assignment was made for the purpose of hindering, delaying, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Boyer Bros., Inc. v. Board of Com'rs of Routt County
... ... second part, their successors and assigns.' ... The ... claim sued upon in this action did not pass by the ... assignment. In Palmer v. [87 Colo. 280] McCarthy, 2 Colo.App ... 422, 428, 31 P. 241, 243, it is said: 'It is a ... well-settled rule of construction that when the deed ... ...
-
Halbouer v. Cuenin
... ... been by the latter, as deputy, and not in the name of his ... principal by himself as deputy. Palmer v. McCarthy, 2 ... Colo.App. 422, 31 P. 241, is cited. The validity of a general ... deed of assignment was involved in that case, and the ... ...
-
Bamer v. Wright
...does not show that the signers even 'deposed' before the officer. It recites only that they subscribed. It was held in Palmer v. McCarthy, 2 Colo.App. 422, 31 P. 241, 'The assignor is also required to verify the inventory and list of creditors under oath. The proceedings were in this respec......
-
Kellogg v. Thropp
... ... ratable participation by his creditors in its benefits, or ... the deed is void. Palmer v. McCarthy, 2 Colo.App. 422, 31 P ... A void ... instrument is without force or effect for any purpose, and ... none can be given to ... ...