Palmer v. State, 96-1705
Decision Date | 25 April 1997 |
Docket Number | No. 96-1705,96-1705 |
Citation | 692 So.2d 974 |
Parties | 22 Fla. L. Weekly D1065 Kevin PALMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
We grant Kevin Palmer's motion for rehearing, withdraw our per curiam affirmance issued January 21, 1997, reverse Palmer's sentence, and remand for resentencing.
Palmer appeals from the sentence imposed upon resentencing following his prior appeal from a conviction of aggravated battery with a firearm. See Palmer v. State, 667 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (Palmer I ). He correctly contends that it was error to sentence him to a minimum mandatory eight-year prison term on the basis that he utilized a semi-automatic weapon when the information charged and the jury's verdict merely found that he had used a "firearm." 1
Analogous cases have made it clear that Palmer's possession of a semi-automatic weapon during the commission of the aggravated battery had to be charged in the indictment before his sentence could be enhanced on this basis. See, e.g., Mesa v. State, 632 So.2d 1094, 1097 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) ( ); Cox v. State, 530 So.2d 464 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988) ( ). Additionally, the verdict form contained no special finding that Palmer had used a semi-automatic weapon; instead, he was found guilty of aggravated battery "with a firearm." Again, analogous cases indicate that this is insufficient to permit the enhancement of his sentence for use of a semi-automatic weapon. See, e.g., State v. Tripp, 642 So.2d 728 (Fla.1994) (...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ramroop v. State
...for robbery with a firearm. On remand, he is to be resentenced for the offense of robbery with a weapon.”); Palmer v. State, 692 So.2d 974, 975 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (reversing and remanding for resentencing where the trial court sentenced the defendant “to a minimum mandatory eight-year pris......
-
Mashburn v. State, 98-1386.
...when a jury finds a weapon has been used." Id. (quoting State v. Overfelt, 457 So.2d 1385, 1387 (Fla.1984)); see also Palmer v. State, 692 So.2d 974 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (error to sentence defendant based on possession of semi-automatic weapon where jury merely found that defendant had used ......
- Deering v. State, 97-04715