Palmer v. State, 82
Decision Date | 10 February 1966 |
Docket Number | No. 82,82 |
Citation | 182 So.2d 625 |
Parties | John Albert PALMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Clyde T. Windham, Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James T. Carlisle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Vero Beach, for appellee.
The defendant, John Albert Palmer, was charged in a two count information with larceny of an automobile and taking and using personal property of another without consent. He entered a plea of guilty without benefit of counsel and was placed on probation for a period of seven years. On January 8, 1962, the trial court revoked defendant's probation and sentenced him to a term of two years in state prison. Defendant filed a motion to vacate this judgment and sentence pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, on October 22, 1963, and the trial court entered an order vacating the same on January 9, 1964, one day after defendant's sentence had expired. The next day the defendant appeared with counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the first count. The state entered a nolle prosequi as to the other count. Subsequently, on April 6, 1964, the defendant appeared with counsel, withdrew his plea of not guilty, and entered a plea of guilty. The trial court sentenced defendant to a term of two years and six months. Defendant filed a motion to vacate this last sentence contending that the second sentence was invalid because, prior to the vacating of the first sentence, he had served that term in full. He appeals from a denial of this motion to vacate.
Where a sentence still being served by a defendant is vacated on his motion, he cannot complain if he is later sentenced to punishment harsher than that originally imposed. 1 The rule is otherwise where the first sentence has been fully satisfied. 2
The foregoing statement from * * *'8 R.C.L. Criminal Alws, § 247 has been expressly approved by the Supreme Court. 3
We apply it here and reverse the order appealed with directions to vacate the second judgment and sentence and discharge the defendant from custody.
1 Murphy v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 1900, 177 U.S. 155, 20 S.Ct. 639, 44 L.Ed. 711; Smith v. Brown, 1938, 135 Fla. 830, 185 So. 732 ( ); 21 Am.Jur.2d, Criminal Law, § 570 at note 12; Annot., 168 A.L.R. 706, 717 (1947). See also 24 C.J.S. Criminal Law § 1589. Cf. Michell v. State ex rel. Callahan, Fla.App.1963, 154 So.2d 701.
2 '* * * where a judgment has been fully satisfied by the defendant, the trial court has no power to amend it by increasing...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Dixon, 7173
...on the subject, such as Johnson v. State, Fla.1966, 184 So.2d 161; McCormick v. State, Fla.App.1964, 164 So.2d 557; and Palmer v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 625. And the writ of error coram nobis would be equally unavailing. Grant v. State, Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 503; Russ v. State, Fl......
-
State v. Acuna
...hold that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to resentence him. See Davis v. Wainwright, 408 So.2d 824 (Fla.App.1982); Palmer v. State, 182 So.2d 625 (Fla.App.1966). The state contends that the court had the power to correct the sentence in this case, because defendant was still serving hi......
-
Clark v. State
...an illegal sentence and impose a harsher sentence without violating the defendant's double jeopardy rights.”); Palmer v. State, 182 So.2d 625, 626 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966) (“Where a sentence still being served by a defendant is vacated on his motion, he cannot complain if he is later sentenced t......
-
State v. Ortiz
...749 So.2d 545, 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); see also Willingham v. State, 833 So.2d 237, 238 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Palmer v. State, 182 So.2d 625, 626–27 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966). Thus, the trial court may not correct the illegal suspended entry of sentence by imposing probation or community control ......