Palmer v. State, 96-2956

Decision Date11 December 1996
Docket NumberNo. 96-2956,96-2956
Citation683 So.2d 678
Parties21 Fla. L. Weekly D2603 Floyd E. PALMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, No. 93-755 CF10; Stanton S. Kaplan, Judge.

Floyd E. Palmer, Crestview, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ettie Feistmann, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant's rule 3.850 motion was summarily denied by an order that did not attach any record excerpts. Appellant had alleged that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call a witness whose testimony would have been favorable to the defense. The motion stated that the witness was available to testify at trial. This allegation was sufficient to require consideration by the trial court. Highsmith v. State, 617 So.2d 825, 827 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). In the absence of a record, we cannot determine whether the failure to call the witness made any difference in the outcome of the trial.

The order denying the motion is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings. On remand, if the trial court does not grant the appellant's motion, it must either conduct an evidentiary hearing or attach to its order excerpts from the record that conclusively disprove the appellant's claim. We agree with the trial court that the remainder of the appellant's allegations were legally insufficient and affirm the denial of those claims.

GUNTHER, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and WARNER, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Courtemanche v. Sec'y
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Florida
    • January 28, 2015
    ...omission of the testimony prejudiced the outcome of the trial. Highsmith v. State, 617 So. 2d 825 (Fla 1st DCA 1993); Palmer v. State, 683 So. 2d 678 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). The parties agree in their motion and response that, at the time of the instant trial, Harris was in the Lake County, Fl......
  • Nelson v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • June 3, 2004
    ...1st DCA 1993); Williamson v. State, 559 So.2d 723 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Puig v. State, 636 So.2d 121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Palmer v. State, 683 So.2d 678 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). The Second District has held to the contrary. In Odom v. State, 770 So.2d 195, 197 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), the Second Distr......
  • Ajuste v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 17, 2009
    ...hearing or attach to its order excerpts from the record that conclusively disprove the appellant's claim." Palmer v. State, 683 So.2d 678, 679 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Because appellant's claim is not conclusively refuted by the attachments in the record, we reverse and remand for an evidentiar......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT